18-Sep-2024 |
PENDING |
|
|
--- |
--- |
07-Aug-2024 |
PENDING |
The authorized representatives,
Mr. Rajeev Gupta and Mr. Narendra, appeared and requested adjournment, as
arguing counsel is not available today. The request for adjournment, although
submitted, indicates that the OC of the project has already been received.
Reply already filed on July 1, 2024, in addition to replying on April 25, 2024.
Proxy Counsel Mr. Aaditya Das
appeared and requested adjournment as arguing counsel is held up in some family
affairs as he has been blessed with a baby who is in hospital.
Matter to come for further
proceedings on September 18, 2024, at 11 a.m. |
SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA |
View Order |
22-Aug-2024 |
03-Jul-2024 |
PENDING |
Present Mr. Shubham Dayma,
Advocate for Chintels India Pvt. Ltd. appeared and requested two weeks’ time to
file final approval of BIP and to appear for argument on 07.08.2024 at 11A.M.
Present Mr. Surender Kumar
(Manager) and Ms. Harsha (Manager) appeared and filed copy of deed as directed
vide proceedings dated 29.05.2024 to prove that ATS Kocoon is part of Umritha
Infrastructure Development LLP which is in NCLT. Reply needs to be examined.
Present Proxy Counsel Chahat Arya
on behalf of Solutrean Building Technologies Pvt Ltd and filed revised
affidavit that they shall apply for registration prior to selling but authority
is of view that, since Building plans of commercial component are already
approved, the promoters must apply for registration with in 20 days. Further it
is noticed from affidavit that OC of project (Chintels Caladium) Sector 109,
Gurugram was registered on 08.11.2017 which is after that date of coming into
force of the Act of 2017. Hence, they are directed to apply for registration of
project as it was an ongoing project as on date of implementation of RERA. They
must apply for registration within 20 days and to show cause as to why penalty
proceedings u/s 59 should not be initiated and why penalty for non-registration
should not be imposed as OC received on 08.11.2017 was not an OC received prior
to act coming in force as fire NOC was received by promoters on 10.10.2017.
Matter to come for further proceedings
on 07.08.2024 at 11 A.M.
|
SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA |
View Order |
18-Jul-2024 |
29-May-2024 |
PENDING |
Advocate Rishi Gujral and Advocate Chahat
Arya appeared on behalf of Solutrean
Building Technologies Pvt Ltd.
Proxy
Advocate Harshita Tyagi appeared on behalf of Advocate Charu Sangwan of M/s
Chintels India Ltd
Sh. Rajeev Gupta (Senior Vice President)
and Sh. Narender Kumar (Manager) appeared on behalf of ATS
Infrastructure Ltd and Umritha Infrastructure Development LLP
Counsel
for Solutrean Building Technologies Pvt Ltd is directed to file the revised
affidavit declaring that they shall obtain registration of commercial component
prior to creation of third-party rights and sale of said project.
AR
of ATS Infrastructure Ltd states that Umritha
Infrastructure Development LLP is in NCLT. Therefore, they are directed to file
the copy of deed filed at the time of registration of Umritha Infrastructure
Development LLP to clarify the link between both the companies.
Proxy
counsel for Chintel India Ltd request for adjournment of hearing. They are
further directed to file the copy of final approval of BIP if any received from
DTCP, Haryana against the in-principal
approval of BIP which they had received on 11-04-2016.
Matter to come up on 03-07-2024 at 10:30 A.M. |
SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA |
View Order |
31-May-2024 |
15-May-2024 |
PENDING |
Advocate Rishi Gujral and Advocate Chahat
Arya on behalf of Solutrean
Building Technologies Pvt Ltd.
None
appeared on behalf of Chintels India Ltd
Ms. Harsha Vats (Manager) and
Sh. Narender Kumar (Manager) appeared on behalf of ATS
Infrastructure Ltd and Umritha Infrastructure Development LLP
As
per proceeding dated 25-04-2024, M/s Chintel India Ltd was directed to submit
the copy of final approval of BIP if any received from DTCP, Haryana against
the in-principal approval of BIP which
they had received on 11-04-2016 but the status of the same has not been
submitted till date.
On the request of counsel for Solutrean Building Technologies Pvt
Ltd and AR of ATS Infrastructure Ltd (Umritha
Infrastructure Development LLP), matter adjourned to 29-05-2024 at 10:30 A.M. |
SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA |
View Order |
21-May-2024 |
25-Apr-2024 |
PENDING |
Advocate Rishi Gujral and Advocate Chahat
Arya on behalf of Solutrean
Building Technologies Pvt Ltd.
Sh.
Shubham Dayma (Advocate) on behalf of Chintels India Ltd
Sh. Rajeev Gupta (Senior Vice
President) and Sh. Narender Kumar (General Manager) appeared on behalf of ATS
Infrastructure Ltd and Umritha Infrastructure Development LLP
AR
of M/s ATS Infrastructure Ltd and Umritha Infrastructure Development LLP states
that there is no evidence held on record of OC of convenient shopping, which is
a part of pocket B, part of license no. 13 of 2011. The license holder of the
said license is M/s Chintel India Ltd, and developer of pocket B is M/s
Solutrean Building Technologies Pvt Ltd. AR further states that there is a
clerical error in the reply filed by /s ATS Infrastructure Ltd where the area
of pocket A was mentioned as 10.768 acres instead of 12.21225 acres which is as
per the clause 7 of JDA dated 16-05-2011 and the area of Solutrean Building
Technologies Pvt Ltd is 3.6687 acres which is mentioned as smaller project land
and the same is also known as pocket B as per the approved building plan.
On
the last date of hearing, counsel for Solutrean Building Technologies Pvt Ltd
was directed to supply copy of the reply submitted in the authority to M/s Chintels India Ltd. counsel for M/s Chintels
India Ltd states that they have received the copy of reply yesterday and seeks
one week time to file the reply to the same. Request is allowed. They shall
file the reply within 10 days after supplying the copy of the same to Solutrean
Building Technologies Pvt Ltd. Also, counsel for M/s Chintels India Ltd is hereby
finally directed to submit the copy of final approval of BIP if any received
from DTCP, Haryana against the in-principal
approval of BIP which they had received on 11-04-2016.
Counsel
for Solutrean Building Technologies Pvt Ltd states that they have not sold even
a single unit of the convenient shopping of the total project land area
measuring 3.668 acres and that they have not created any third-party rights so
far as the commercial part of the project is concerned. They are directed to
file the affidavit with regard to the same. As regards the residential units,
he submits that OC was applied on 26-09-2016 and obtained on 08-11-2017. Counsel
for Solutrean Building Technologies Pvt Ltd requests for a copy of reply
earlier filed by M/s Chintel India Ltd in the authority. Copy to be supplied by
M/s Chintel India Ltd to Counsel for Solutrean Building Technologies Pvt Ltd.
Matter
to come up on 15-05-2024 at 10:30 A.M. |
SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA |
View Order |
08-May-2024 |
03-Apr-2024 |
PENDING |
Ms. Chahat Arya (Proxy
Advocate on behalf of Ms. Rishi Gujral) in Soultrean
building Technologies Pvt Ltd.
Sh. Shubham Dayma (Advocate) on behalf of Chintels India Ltd.
None appeared on behalf of ATS
Infrastructure Ltd
None appeared on behalf of Umritha Infrastructure Development LLP
Final opportunity of hearing is given to the promoters to explain
the entire status of license no. 13 of 2011 granted by DTCP, Haryana against
which a JDA was signed on 16-05-2011 between M/s Chintels India Ltd and Umritha
Infrastructure Development LLP. Counsel on behalf of M/s Chintels India Ltd
states that they had applied for change of BIP on 25-01-2016 and 05-02-2016 for
which in-principle approval was granted by DTCP on 11-04-2016 subject to
certain conditions which was to be complied within 90 days but nothing is held
on record regarding the actual beneficiary of the project inspite of giving
several opportunities of hearing and to explain that whether the final approval
has been received or not.
Further, it has came to the notice of the authority during
proceedings that one more JDA was signed
between M/s Chintels India Ltd and M/s Soultrean Building Technologies Pvt
Ltd for area measuring 3.668 acres as
stated by the proxy counsel on behalf of M/s Soultrean Building Technologies
Pvt Ltd and they had submitted the reply today itself with respect to the
project land under JDA.
Counsel for M/s Chintels India Ltd request for a copy of reply
filed by Soultrean Building Technologies Pvt Ltd. Therefore, the proxy counsel
for Soultrean Building Technologies Pvt Ltd is hereby directed to supply one
copy of their reply to M/s Chintels
India Ltd.
Matter to come up on 25-04-2024 at 10:00 A.M. |
SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA |
View Order |
12-Apr-2024 |
14-Mar-2024 |
PENDING |
Sh. Amresh Bind (Advocate) appeared on behalf of IRP Sh. Vikram
Bajaj appointed by NCLT in Umritha Infrastructure Development LLP.
Sh. Narender Kumar (Manager) appeared on behalf of ATS
Infrastructure Ltd.
Sh. Navraj (Proxy Advocate) appeared on behalf of Chintels India
Ltd.
Sh. Amresh Bind (Advocate) appeared on behalf of IRP states that
Umritha Infrastructure Development LLP had executed the JDA consists of two
partners i.e. one is Sh. Geetambar Anand
in individual capacity and the other partner is ATS Infrastructure Ltd
theough its director/designated partner/nominee Sh. Santosh Kumar. He further
states that they shall be filing the copy of LLP agreement, however, the said
Umritha Infrastructure Development LLP is under NCLT, and moratorium has been
imposed on it. (copy of the NCLT order dated 31-01-2024 has already been
filed). Further, he states that pocket A which was being developed by Umritha
Infrastructure Development LLP has been completed and OC was received on
09-10-2017. However, the same was applied on 26-09-2016.
He further submitted that the units have been handed over to all
the allottees and conveyance deed has also been executed in most of the units
and further submitted that as per the JDA, 284 units out of 444 units and 5
convenient shops belong to Umritha Infrastructure Development LLP which they
have delivered to the concerned allottee. Further, attention has been brought
towards clause XII of the JDA dated 16-05-2011 and the same got registered on
30-06-2011 as per which the pocket B of the said licensed project i.e. 2,70,000
sq.ft of FSI was to be developed by SBTL about which they have no knowledge.
Authority observes that there were certain complaints filed
against ATS Infrastructure Ltd as per which the said proceedings of suo motu
non-registration were initiated. The said complaint is pending before the
authority and next date of hearing 07-05-2024 and planning branch was directed
to check the status of project vide proceeding dated 06-05-2023 is still
pending and the planning branch of the authority is hereby again directed to
submit the report in this regard within 15 days. Matter to come up on 03-04-2024
at 10:00 A.M. |
SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA |
View Order |
12-Apr-2024 |
21-Feb-2024 |
FIRST HEARING |
Sh. Narender Kumar
(Manager) appeared on behalf of Umritha Infrastructure
Development LLP c/o M/s
ATS
Infrastructure Ltd and Sh. Charu Sangwan (Advocate) appeared on behalf of M/s Chintels
India Ltd.
As per the reply submitted by Umritha Infrastructure
Development LLP, it has been stated that the said project is developed in two
phases i.e., Pocket A namely ATS Kocoon area measuring 10.768 acres by Umritha
Infrastructure Development LLP and Pocket-B namely Chintel Caladium area
measuring 5.113 acres by M/s Chintel India Ltd. Also, it has been informed
that vide order of Hon’ble NCLT Delhi dated 31-01-2024, an IRP has been
appointed in Umritha Infrastructure Development LLP and a moratorium has been
imposed on legal proceedings in terms of section 14 of IBC, 2016. IRP of
Umritha Infrastructure Development LLP is directed to appear on 14-03-2024 to
clarify the status and submit list of partners of Umritha Infrastructure
Development LLP and status of ATS Infrastructure Ltd if it is a partner or
subsidiary.
During
the course of hearing, counsel for M/s Chintel India Ltd has filed the reply
which includes in-principle BIP approval vide letter dated 11-04-2016 whereas
the copy of occupation certificate is obtained in the name of M/s Chintel India
Ltd and the copy of registered JDA dated 16-05-2011 is filed with the reply. As
per the reply filed on behalf of Umritha Infrastructure Development LLP (ATS
Infrastructure Ltd), they are claiming that out of the total licensed area, an
area measuring 10.768 acres has been developed by Umritha Infrastructure
Development LLP and occupation certificate for their part of the project was
received on 09-10-2017 and the remaining part of the project was developed by
M/s Chintel India Ltd as project named “Chintel Caladium”. M/s Chintel India Ltd is directed to clarify
the status of the part of the project which has been developed by them. Matter
to come up on 14-03-2024 at 10:00 A.M. |
SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA |
View Order |
22-Feb-2024 |