08-Nov-2023 |
DISPOSED |
Order pronounced.
The respondent is directed to hand over possession of the subject plot and to
pay interest to the complainant against the paid-up amount of Rs.82,50,000/- at the prescribed rate of
interest i.e. 10.75% per annum for every
month of delay from the due date of possession i.e., 22.01.2018 till offer of
possession plus two months after
obtaining completion certificate/part completion certificate from the competent
authority or actual handing over of possession, whichever is earlier, as per
section 18 (1) of the Act of 2016 read with rule 15 of the rules.
Detailed order will
follow. Matter stands disposed off. File
be consigned to the registry. |
ASHOK SANGWAN |
View Order |
09-Nov-2023 |
11-Oct-2023 |
RESERVED |
The present complaint
was filed on 30.09.2022 and the reply on behalf of respondent was received on
25.01.2023.
Succinct facts of the case as per pleadings and annexures are as under:
S. N.
Particulars
Details
1.
Name of the project
“Ramprastha City”, Sectors 37C and 37D, Gurugram, Haryana
2.
Project area
105.402 acres
3.
Nature of the
project
Residential Colony
4.
DTCP license no.
and validity status
128 of 2012
dated 28.12.2012 valid upto 06.04.2025
5.
Name of licensee
KNS Nirman
6.
RERA
Registered/ not registered
Not registered
7.
plot no.
Nursing home plot falling on 60-meter-wide road
(Page no. 18 of the complaint)
8.
Unit area admeasuring
1195 sq. Yds. (approx. 0.25 acres)
(Page no. 23 of the complaint)
9.
Memorandum of understating
22.01.2015
(Page no. 24 of the complaint)
10.
Addendum to Memorandum of understating
05.10.2018
(Page no. 23 of the complaint)
11.
Date of execution of plot buyer’s agreement
N. A
12.
Possession clause
4. That for Clause 3 (3.1) pertaining to time of
handing over the possession and penalty, the following clause mentioned
herein under shall substitute the one written in the MOU.
“Subject to terms in clause and subject to the
allottee having complied with all the terms and condition of this agreement
and the application and not being in default under any of the provisions of
this agreement and compliances with all provisions, documentation etc. as
prescribed by the RAMPRASTHA, RAMPRASTHA proposed
to hand over the possession of the LAND from one year of the finalization of
alignment of the 60-meter road by Huda sector.
The allottee agrees and understands that RAMPRASTHA shall be entitled to a
grace period of One hundred and
twenty (120) days, for applying and obtaining the ALL/ANY certificates
required.”
13.
Due date of possession
22.01.2018 (calculated from the date of MOU)
[Calculated as per Fortune Infrastructure and Ors. vs. Trevor
D'Lima and Ors. (12.03.2018 - SC); MANU/SC/0253/2018]
14.
Basic price of the plot
Rs.89,62,500/-
[As per memorandum of understating at page no. 19 of the complaint]
15.
Amount paid by the complainant
Rs.82,50,000/-
[As per submitted by complainant page no. 6 of the complaint and the
same was admittedly by the respondent in his reply]
16.
Occupation certificate /Completion certificate
Not received
17.
Offer of possession
Not offered
The counsel for the
respondent states that demarcation approval of the project is pending with the
DTCP and possession of the site will be handed over to the complainant after
receipt of occupation certificate.
The counsel for the
complainant states that possession may be handed over on demarcation.
Arguments heard.
Order reserved.
Matter to come up on 08.11.2023 for
pronouncement of order. |
ASHOK SANGWAN |
View Order |
17-Oct-2023 |
29-Aug-2023 |
PENDING |
The present complaint was filed on 30.09.2022 and the reply
on behalf of respondent was received on 25.01.2023.
Vide order dated 26.04.2023, the respondent was directed to
file specific date by which the possession of the allotted unit shall be
delivered to the complainant and which date conveyance deed shall be executed.
Till date no document has been filed by the respondent.
During hearing on 17.05.2023, the respondent has submitted a
copy of the letter dated 12.04.2023 from DTCP Haryana wherein a direction has
been given for inviting objections from each existing allottee regarding the
said amendment in the layout plan for which the allottees were to be granted 30
days time to submit objections. The notice was published on
19.04.2023 and 30 days shall expire on 18.05.2023. In case any objections
are received, then the same would be decided within a period of 90 days.
The counsel for the complainant submitted that two sites for
nursing home have been demarcated in the revised layout plan and the site
allotted to the complainant for an area of 1195 sq. yards exists in the
same. The same may be handed over to the complainant.
Now the complainant has moved an application dated 12.07.2023
for preponement of hearing.
The counsel for the respondent requests for a short
adjournment as the case was otherwise fixed for 11.10.2023 which on the
application of the complainant has been preponed for today. The counsel for the respondent to seek
instructions from the respondent company regarding the finalization of revised
layout plan. The counsel for the
complainant requests that despite having paid the total sale consideration
money, the possession of the unit is being delayed on the one pretext or the
other while no revision on the layout plan can be made without the consent and no consent by the complainant-allottee
pertaining to the revision has been
given although the promoter has sought NOC w.r.t. above revisions and no specific
objections against the proposed revision has been given and even as per the
above public notice, revision of the above layout was to be finalized within a
period of one month. One last opportunity is given for argument.
Matter to come up on 11.10.2023 for further proceedings. |
VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL ASHOK SANGWAN |
View Order |
14-Sep-2023 |
17-May-2023 |
PENDING |
The present complaint was filed on 30.09.2022 and the reply
on behalf of respondent was received on 25.01.2023.
On the last date of hearing i.e., 26.04.2023, the respondent
was directed to file specific date by which the possession of the allotted unit
shall be delivered to the complainant and which date conveyance deed shall be
executed. Till date no document has been filed by the respondent.
Today the respondent has submitted a copy of the letter dated
12.04.2023 from DTCP Haryana wherein a direction has been given for inviting
objections from each existing allottee regarding the said amendment in the
layout plan for which the allottees were to be granted 30 days time to submit objections. The notice was published on 19.04.2023 and 30
days shall expire on 18.05.2023. In case
any objections are received, then the same would be decided within a period of
90 days.
The counsel for the complainant states that two sites for
nursing home have been demarcated in the revised layout plan and the site
allotted to the complainant for an area of 1195 sq. yards exists in the
same. The same may be handed over to the complainant.
Matter to come up on 11.10.2023 for further proceedings. |
ASHOK SANGWAN |
View Order |
09-Jun-2023 |
26-Apr-2023 |
PENDING |
The counsel for the respondent has submitted
the copy of the approved revised layout
plan dated 09.02.2023. The complainant
may study the revised plan and make submissions, if required before the next
date of hearing. The respondent is directed to file specific date by which the
possession of the allotted unit shall be delivered to the complainant and date
by which the conveyance deed shall be executed within a period of 2 weeks.
Matter to come up on 17.05.2023 for
further proceedings. |
ASHOK SANGWAN |
View Order |
04-May-2023 |
12-Apr-2023 |
PENDING |
Despite directions, no layout plan/revised
layout plan has been submitted by the
respondent even after more than a month since the last hearing.
The counsel for the respondent states that the
revised layout plan is yet to be approved by the competent authority. The
respondent is directed to file the copy of revised layout plan submitted before
the competent authority alongwith the original layout plan on the basis of
which the site was allotted. The proof of having submitted the application may
also be submitted with the said layout plan within a period of one week failing
which the respondent shall be liable for penal action for non-compliance of the
directions of the Authority under the Act,
2016.
Matter to come up on 26.04.2023 for further proceedings. |
ASHOK SANGWAN |
View Order |
17-Apr-2023 |
01-Mar-2023 |
PENDING |
The present complaint was filed on 30.09.2022 and the reply
on behalf of respondent was received on 25.01.2023.
Vide order
dated 25.01.2023, the respondent was directed to submit a copy of layout plan
indicating the site allotted to the complainant within a period of one week and
the same have not been submitted till date.
Succinct facts of the case as per pleadings and
annexures are as under:
S. N.
Particulars
Details
1.
Name
of the project
“Ramprastha
City”, Sectors 37C and 37D, Gurugram, Haryana
2.
Project area
105.402 acres
3.
Nature of the project
Residential Colony
4.
DTCP license no. and validity
status
128 of 2012 dated 28.12.2012
valid upto 06.4.2025
5.
Name of licensee
KNS Nirman
6.
RERA
Registered/ not registered
Not registered
7.
plot
no.
Nursing
home plot falling on 60-meter-wide road
(Page
no. 18 of the complaint)
8.
Unit
area admeasuring
1195
sq. Yds. (approx. 0.25 acres)
(Page
no. 23 of the complaint)
9.
Memorandum
of understating
22.01.2015
(Page
no. 24 of the complaint)
10.
Addendum
to Memorandum of understating
05.10.2018
(Page
no. 23 of the complaint)
11.
Date
of execution of plot buyer’s agreement
N. A
12.
Possession
clause
4. That for Clause 3 (3.1) pertaining
to time of handing over the possession and penalty, the following clause
mentioned herein under shall substitute the one written in the MOU.
“Subject to terms in clause
and subject to the allottee having complied with all the terms and condition
of this agreement and the application and not being in default under any of
the provisions of this agreement and compliances with all provisions, documentation
etc. as prescribed by the RAMPRASTHA, RAMPRASTHA proposed to hand over the possession of the
LAND from one year of the finalization of alignment of the 60-meter road by
Huda sector. The allottee agrees and understands that RAMPRASTHA shall be entitled
to a grace period of One hundred and
twenty (120) days, for applying and obtaining the ALL/ANY certificates
required.”
13.
Due date of possession
N. A
14.
Basic price of the plot
Rs.89,62,500/-
[As per memorandum of understating at page no. 19 of the complaint]
15.
Amount paid by the complainant
Rs.82,50,000/-
[As per submitted by
complainant page no. 6 of the complaint and the same was admittedly by the
respondent in his reply]
16.
Occupation certificate /Completion certificate
Not received
17.
Offer of
possession
Not offered
The counsel for the respondent
states that the respondent has applied for a revised layout plan to the
competent authority on account of certain re-alignment and approval is expected
within one month. Thereafter, the respondent shall commit deadline within which
possession of the allotted Nursery Home site can be handed over to the
complainant.
Matter to come up on 12.04.2023
for further proceedings. Meanwhile, the respondents are directed not to cancel
the unit of the complainant. |
ASHOK SANGWAN |
View Order |
02-Mar-2023 |
17-Feb-2023 |
PENDING |
Due to paucity of time, matter could not be
heard.
Adjourned to 01.03.2023 for further
proceedings. |
VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL |
View Order |
28-Feb-2023 |
25-Jan-2023 |
PENDING |
The present complaint was filed on 30.09.2022
and registered as complaint no. 6487 of 2022. On 13.01.2023, the counsel
respondent states that a copy of reply has been supplied to the counsel for the
complainant and the reply is being filed in the registry. The respondent was
directed to file the within 3 days in the registry of the authority. Despite proper service of notice, the respondent has
failed to comply with the orders of the authority, by not filing written reply within the time allowed.
The counsel for the respondent states that
the reply could not be filed in the registry as the order of last proceedings
dated 13.01.2023 has been uploaded only on 19.01.2023 and in view of the
directions wherein for filing the reply within 3 days, the reply was not
accepted by the registry.
The counsel for the complainant states that
the respondent has been deliberately delaying the filing of reply on one
pretext or another and hence, no more opportunity for the same be given and the
matter may be heard and decided at the earliest
as the site is of a nursing home
and there are apprehension that the site may be alienated to third party and
hence, may be restrained from creating any third party rights with respect to
the above unit.
The copy of reply has been supplied during the
proceedings and is taken on record. Since despite filing of the complaint way
back in September, 2022 and two
opportunities of hearing but reply is not filed. The respondent is restrained from creating
third party rights in respect of above unit till next date of hearing.
The respondent is further directed to file
the copy of layout plan indicating the site allotted to the complainant within
one week and a copy of the same be also supplied to the counsel for the
complainant.
Matter to come up on 17.02.2023 for further proceedings. |
VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA |
View Order |
01-Feb-2023 |
13-Jan-2023 |
PENDING |
The
present complaint was filed on 30.09.2022 and registered as complaint
no. 6487 of 2022. Despite proper service of notice, no written reply has
yet been filed. Moreover, the service is also confirmed from the fact that on
the last date of hearing, Shri Navneet Kumar Advocate, of the respondent
company appeared and was directed to file the reply within two weeks, i.e., by
28.12.2022.
The
counsel for the respondent states that a copy of reply has been supplied to the
counsel for the complainant and the reply is being filed in the registry.
Respondent is directed to file the reply within 3 days in the registry. Last opportunity is being granted. In case
the reply is not filed within the time allowed, the defence of the respondent
may struck off.
Matter to
come up on 25.1.2023 for further proceedings |
VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA |
View Order |
19-Jan-2023 |
14-Dec-2022 |
PENDING |
Reply has not been filed by the respondent.
Counsel for the respondent requests for a short adjournment for filing of
reply. Respondent is directed to file reply within two weeks i.e., by 28.12.2022
in the registry of the authority. In case reply is not filed within the time
allowed, the defence of the respondent may be struck off.
Matter to come up on 13.01.2023 for further proceedings. |
VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL ASHOK SANGWAN SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA |
View Order |
20-Dec-2022 |
09-Dec-2022 |
FIRST HEARING |
Due to paucity of time, the matter could
not be heard.
Adjourned to 14.12.2022 for the purpose as already fixed. |
VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL ASHOK SANGWAN SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA |
View Order |
13-Dec-2022 |