| Party Dtls | Self / Adv Name | District | Current Status | Next Date of Hearing | Complaint Dispatched | Complaint Dispatched On | Dispatched Tracking Id | Complaint Dispatched Remarks | First-Hearing/Scrutinized Remarks | View Notice |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GURMEET KAUR AND PRITIKA GREWAL V/S SPAZE TOWERS PVT LTD |
MEDHYA AHLUWALIA | GURUGRAM | DISMISSED | NOT REQUIRED | Not Yet | FIRST HEARING | -- |
| Date of Hearing | Status | Proceedings of the day | Bench | Order | Order Uploaded On |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 29-Oct-2024 | DISMISSED | Matter is dismissed as withdrawn. | RAJINDER KUMAR | View Order | 12-Nov-2024 |
| 25-Sep-2024 | PENDING | Matter is adjourned to 04.02.2025. | RAJINDER KUMAR | View Order | 30-Sep-2024 |
| 27-May-2024 | PENDING | Matter is adjourned to 25.09.2024. | RAJINDER KUMAR | View Order | 24-Jul-2024 |
| 27-Oct-2023 | RE-OPEN/PENDING | RE-OPENED | RAJINDER KUMAR | View Order | 02-Nov-2023 |
| 23-Aug-2023 | PENDING | It is pointed out that conveyance deed has already been executed. Objections raised by JD were also dismissed. Matter was sent to the Accounts Officer for calculation of the amount. Report/calculation has already been received. Learned counsel for JD has filed certain objections. Heard. According to him, his client was entitled for outstanding dues as per order/decree under execution. JD never gave any detail of outstanding dues before today. Even if JD has any outstanding dues, same can raise demand separately. As calculation has already been received. In view of the order passed by Punjab and Haryana High Court at Chandigarh, in case titled as M/s International Land Developers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Aditi Chauhan and others CWP No. 7738 of 2022, and M/s International Land Developers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Nitin Mathur and others 7750 of 2022. Let recovery certificate be issued to the Collector, Gurugram to recover decretal amount as arrears of land revenue. File be sent to Accounts Officer immediately to prepare recovery certificate. Same be signed from the undersigned. Accounts Officer to give compliance report till 27.10.2023. | RAJINDER KUMAR | View Order | 31-Aug-2023 |
| 10-Jul-2023 | PENDING | Learned counsel for JD requests for adjournment stating that either to make settlement with the DH or to pay decretal amount, as per calculation done by CA/Account Officer. Be paid till next date. To come on 23.08.2023 for further proceedings. | RAJINDER KUMAR | View Order | 18-Jul-2023 |
| 11-May-2023 | PENDING | It is submitted by the DH, that she went to the office of JD to take possession of her unit, but same refused to hand over possession, unless she paid certain amount of maintenance etc. On the other hand, according to learned counsel for JD, the latter is ready to hand over possession of subject unit, without imposing condition of any payment etc. Even if, there are outstanding dues against the DH, same may issue demand letter in that regard, but it was not proper to deny handing over possession unless certain amounts are not paid, which are disputed by DH. DH is thus free to take possession of her unit, at any time. So far as execution of the conveyance deed is concerned, according to learned counsel for JD, DH did not pay money to purchase stamp duty, to facilitate her client to execute conveyance deed. Two demand drafts total amounting Rs. 1,85,510/- are handed over by the DH to the counsel for JD for purchase of stamp duty. Learned counsel for JD undertakes to get conveyance deed executed, within one month. Be done accordingly. To come on 10.07.2023 for further proceedings. | RAJINDER KUMAR | --- | --- |
| 28-Mar-2023 | PENDING | As per learned counsel for JD, she has not received copy of report given by CA. Same is handed over today. It is submitted by learned counsel for DH that through order under execution, the respondent was directed to execute conveyance deed, after offering possession of unit on deposition of necessary expenses. According to him, his client is ready to deposit necessary expenses subject that JD is ready to hand over possession. Learned counsel request to coerce the directors of JD to execute conveyance deed by issuing arrest warrants against them. Issue show cause notice to directors of JD, as why same be not committed to civil imprisonment for not complying with said order i.e. to execute conveyance deed, after offering possession. Reply (if any) be filed till next date. As per learned counsel for JD, her client was ready to hand over possession, but the allottee/DH did not deposit necessary expenses. All this is refuted by learned counsel for DH. According to him, his client did not receive any offer of the possession. As held on previous date, by this forum JD failed to prove that same offered to hand over possession by sending any notice. I find no force in this plea of leaned counsel for JD. To come on 11.05.2023 for further proceedings. | RAJINDER KUMAR | View Order | 06-Apr-2023 |
| 20-Feb-2023 | PENDING | Both of parties have filed their calculations. Heard on objections raised by the JD. According to learned counsel for DH, JD has calculated the amount of maintenance dues. While in the absence of handing over possession, JD was not entitled to levy maintenance charges. According to learned counsel for JD, after receipt of OC on 28.01.2020, her client offered possession on next day, but DH did not come forward to take the possession. In such a circumstance, according to learned counsel, her client was entitled to levy maintenance charges. Although a document stated to be copy of courier agency has been put on file but noting is legible in it. Learned counsel for DH, denied the fact that his client has received any such offer of the possession. Moreover, according to him, this fact is not mentioned in the decree/order. If letter offering possession was sent by the JD, same would have been mentioned in order under execution. Considering the fact that JD could not prove that letter offering possession was ever delivered to DH. Same is not entitled to levy maintenance charges. Objections in this regard are dismissed. Learned counsel for JD requests for short adjournment. Case has already been delayed. No reason for further adjournment. Request in this regard is declined. Both of parties have submitted their calculations. File be put before the CA of the authority on 22.03.2023 for calculations of amount payable by JD. To come before this forum on 28.03.2023, for further proceedings. | RAJINDER KUMAR | View Order | 23-Feb-2023 |
| 19-Jan-2023 | PENDING | Matter is Adjourned to 20.02.2023. | RAJINDER KUMAR | View Order | 25-Jan-2023 |
| 03-Nov-2022 | PENDING | On previous date, JD was directed to disclose its assets/properties including details of bank account(s). Information was to be given in the form of an affidavit to be sworn by any one from directors. No such affidavit is filed. DH requests to issue arrest warrants against directors of JD. Issue show cause notice to directors of JD as why they be not committed to civil imprisonment for not complying with order of this forum. Reply, if any, be filed till next date. At the same time, an application is filed by JD with request to recall order dated 06.09.2022. It is submitted by learned counsel for JD that his client is filing objection against decree under execution. Admittedly, no such objections were filed till today despite service of notice. There is no reason to recall order dated 06.09.2022. Application is thus dismissed. Certain objections filed. Copy given. Reply be filed till next date To come on 19.01.2023 for consideration of objections/further proceedings. | RAJINDER KUMAR | --- | --- |
| 06-Sep-2022 | PENDING | AR of JD submits that JD is ready to make payment and requests for short time for making payment/settlement. Learned counsel for DH requests for directions to JD to disclose its assets/properties including details of bank account(s) to realise the decretal amount. Allowed. JD is directed to disclose its assets/properties including details of bank account(s). Same is to be filed in the form of an affidavit to be sworn by any one from directors preferably by the managing director. Copies of title deeds and statement of bank account(s) also to be furnished alongwith affidavit. To come on 03.11.2022 for further proceedings. | RAJINDER KUMAR | View Order | 09-Jan-2023 |
| 22-Aug-2022 | FIRST HEARING | Although, DH has filed list of properties of JD. But there is no evidence to verify that these properties are actually owned by JD. Learned counsel for latter seeks some more time to file evidence about ownership of JD in respect of these properties and also about bank account of same. Be filed till next date. To come on 06.09.2022 for further proceedings. | RAJINDER KUMAR | View Order | 09-Jan-2023 |
| Date of Judgement | Party Details | Judgement Uploading Date | View Judgement |
|---|---|---|---|
| 27-Oct-2023 | GURMEET KAUR AND PRITIKA GREWAL V/S SPAZE TOWERS PVT LTD |
--- | --- |
| 29-Oct-2024 | GURMEET KAUR AND PRITIKA GREWAL V/S SPAZE TOWERS PVT LTD |
--- | --- |
Web Information Manager
Shri Arvind Mehtani,Executive Director, HRERA
Mini Secretariat, New Office Block,
2nd & 3rd Floor ,Sector-1,
Panchkula,
Haryana- 134114,India
Email: hrerapkl[dash]hry[at]gov[dot]in
Telephone: +91 172-2584232,2585232
Website Designed and Developed By National Informatics Centre (NIC) and Owned by HRERA PANCHKULA & HRERA GURUGRAM Jointly
© 2018 Copyright. All Rights Reserved.