Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority

Comprehensive Complaint Details

Complaint Detail:RERA-GRG-6349-2019

Party Dtls	Self / Adv Name	District	Current Status	Next Date of Hearing	Complaint Dispatched	Complaint Dispatched On	Dispatched Tracking Id	Complaint Dispatched Remarks	First-Hearing/Scrutinized Remarks	View Notice
SWATI SINGH V/S SUPERTECH LIMITED	PRADEEP YADAV	GURUGRAM	PENDING	20-May-2025	Yes	30-Dec-2019	EH787641874IN	1. You are hereby informed that the above-mentioned complaint has been received against you in this Authority. In this regard this notice along with the copy of the complaint and annexures are being sent herewith through Speed Post and on your e-mail address. Details of Notice may also be seen on the website of the Authority. A copy of the complaint has already been sent by the complainant to your address through Speed Post as well as through e-mail address and copy of tracking report as a proof of having delivered the complaint through Speed Post as well as delivery confirmation report by e-mail has also been submitted by the complainant. 2. You are hereby directed to submit your written reply in two copies with soft copy as per the prescribed proforma available on the website haryanarera.gov.in of this Authority duly supported by all the relevant documents in your defense within 10 days from the date of receipt of this notice the registry of the HARERA Gurugram. 3. You may present your case before the Authority on the date fixed given above personally or through an authorized representative or through an advocate as per the provisions of Section 56 of the Real Estate Regulation and Development Act 2016. 4. In case your reply is not received by stipulated period then no further opportunity would be given to you your defense shall be liable to be struck off and the complaint shall be heard by the Authority in the absence of your defense on merit and matter shall be proceeded ex-parte as per law. Date of Hearing 08.01.2020 Time 1030 AM Venue Court Room New PWD Rest House Civil Lines Gurugram 5. Issued as per the order and the seal of the Authority on this 30th of December 2019. For Secretary HARERA Gurugram	FIRST HEARING

Notice Details

Notice Number	Remarks	Dispatching Date	Dispatch Id	View Notice
First Notice	1. You are hereby informed that the above-mentioned complaint has been received against you in this Authority. In this regard this notice along with the copy of the complaint and annexures are being sent herewith through Speed Post and on your e-mail address. Details of Notice may also be seen on the website of the Authority. A copy of the complaint has already been sent by the complainant to your address through Speed Post as well as through e-mail address and copy of tracking report as a proof of having delivered the complaint through Speed Post as well as delivery confirmation report by e-mail has also been submitted by the complainant. 2. You are hereby directed to submit your written reply in two copies with soft copy as per the prescribed proforma available on the website haryanarera.gov.in of this Authority duly supported by all the relevant documents in your defense within 10 days from the date of receipt of this notice the registry of the HARERA Gurugram. 3. You may present your case before the Authority on the date fixed given above personally or through an authorized representative or through an advocate as per the provisions of Section 56 of the Real Estate Regulation and Development Act 2016. 4. In case your reply is not received by stipulated period then no further opportunity would be given to you your defense shall be liable to be struck off and the complaint shall be heard by the Authority in the absence of your defense on merit and matter shall be proceeded ex-parte as per law. Date of Hearing 08.01.2020 Time 1030 AM Venue Court Room New PWD Rest House Civil Lines Gurugram 5. Issued as per the order and the seal of the Authority on this 30th of December 2019. For Secretary HARERA Gurugram	30-Dec-2019	EH787641874IN

Complaint Listing Details

Date of Hearing	Status	Proceedings of the day	Bench	Order	Order Uploaded On
20-May-2025	PENDING			---	---
15-Apr-2025	RESERVED	Order reserved. Matter to come up on 20.05.2025 for pronouncement of order.	ARUN KUMAR ASHOK SANGWAN	View Order	15-May-2025
21-Jan-2025	PENDING	The complainant filed an application for revival of the present complaint on 30.12.2024 and to implead M/s Sarv Realtors Pvt. Ltd. The application for restoration along with application for impleadment of M/s Sarv Realtors Pvt. Ltd. is allowed in view of the order of the authority dated 29.11.2019 as per which the project is to be transferred to M/s Sarv Realtors Pvt. Ltd. One more opportunity is being given to M/s Sarv Realtors Pvt. Ltd to file the reply within 3 weeks after supplying a copy to the counsel for the respondent. Registry is directed to issue notice to M/s Sarv Realtors Pvt. Ltd. Matter to come up on 15.04.2025 for further proceedings.	ARUN KUMAR VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL ASHOK SANGWAN	View Order	31-Jan-2025
02-Sep-2024	SINE DIE	The Hon’ble NCLT vide its orders dated 25.3.2022 in case No.IB-204(ND)2021 case title as Union Bank of India Versus M/s Supertech Limited has declared moratorium in terms of section 14 of the Code and Shri Hitech Goel, was appointed as Interim Resolution Professional. In Appeal bearing No. Comp. app(AT)(Inst) No.406 of 2022 and IA No4574,4712 of 2022, 634,2763,3330,3331,4316,3619,4306,4973 of 2023 and 2981 of 2024, the Hon’ble NCLAT in the matter of Ram Kishor Arora Suspended Director of Supertech Limited Versus Union of India and Another, vide orders dated 8.7.2024 has clarified that in view of the express order dated 12.9.2022, where following had been directed :- “The CIRP order has not been stayed. The Moratorium is continuing. Hence no clarification is required. Applications are disposed off accordingly,. In view of the above, as the complaint relates to a project of M/s Supertech Limited, the present complaint is adjourned sine die. File be consigned to the registry.	ARUN KUMAR VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL ASHOK SANGWAN	View Order	07-Oct-2024
12-Aug-2024	PENDING	Due to administrative exigency, the matter is adjourned to 02.09.2024 for the purpose as already fixed.	ASHOK SANGWAN VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA	View Order	02-Sep-2024
08-Jul-2024	PENDING	Matter is adjourned to 12.08.2024.	ASHOK SANGWAN VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA	View Order	09-Aug-2024
01-Jul-2024	PENDING	Due to administrative exigency, the matter is adjourned to 08.07.2024 for the purpose as already fixed.	ARUN KUMAR VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL ASHOK SANGWAN SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA	---	---
27-May-2024	PENDING	Due to administrative exigency, the matter is adjourned to 01.07.2024 for the purpose as already fixed.	ARUN KUMAR VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL ASHOK SANGWAN SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA	View Order	05-Jun-2024
19-Apr-2024	PENDING	Since the IRP - respondent No.1 who stepped the shoes of Promoters as per orders of the Hon’ble NCLT, did not timely complied with the directions of the Authority dated 12.01.2024 which was to be complied within 15 days, the Authority hereby imposes a penalty of Rs. One Lakh as per provision of section 63 of the Act, 2016. Shri Hitesh Goel - IRP present in person stated that no separate books of account of each project were being maintained uptil 25 March 2022 i.e. the date when the moratorium was imposed. Further stated that even now no separate books of account is being maintained for each project , only MIS is being prepared and hence they have not filed QPRs. IRP further stated that he has taken the charge of company Supertech Ltd. on as is where is basis and since no separate balance sheets of each project used to be prepared, hence, he could not do the compliances of the directions which were pending for compliance prior to his appointment as IRP of the company and further since June, 2022 he has tried to maintain separate bank account of each project of the company. Further stated that since the registration of most of Gurugram projects have already been elapsed and renewal of the same/extension of the same is still pending. Although they had moved an application No.1172 of 2022 dated 06.02.2023 for extension which was rejected by the authority on 14.11.2023 on account of non-compliances of various deficiencies pointed out by the Authority and non-payment of fee for extension payable to RERA, as per copy of the acknowledgement being filed today in the registry of the authority. Further stated that assets and liabilities of M/s Sarv Realtors and M/s DSC Estate Developers after imposition of moratorium have not been transferred to the management of those companies as he is unable to do so the same as moratorium is going on the whole company of Supertech Ltd. and there is no direction w.r.t the same from Hon’ble NCLT. Further stated that they have enclosed with the affidavit Annexure-J from page 82 to 89 which is details of transfer entries dated 31.03.2020 passed on to M/s Sarv Realtors and M/s DSC Estate Developers. IRP further stated that there was an interim order from Hon’ble NCLAT Delhi after submissions of resolution proposal by the ex-promoters of the company i.e. Supertech Ltd. which is still pending for decision and next date of hearing is 03.05.2024 and once that proposal gets through/approved by NCLT only then further process of revalidation of licence and renewal of RERA registration shall be taken up. Shri Mohit Arora director of M/s Sarv Realtors and M/s DSC Estate Developers is present in person and filed authorization letter and copy of DIN and counsel of M/s Sarv Realtos Ltd. and M/s DSC Estate Developers have filed Power of Attorney. Mr.Mohit Arora agreed and stated that they had taken over M/s Sarv Realtors and M/s DSC Estate Developers from M/s Supertech Limited and now they are running the projects and bank accounts of these are being managed by them. The counsels for the complainant (s) states that since the IRP has not filed the QPR and has not updated the status of the project, they are unable to know the factual position of the project. Further stated that since the IRP entered into the shoes of promoter in June, 2022 and had been assigned the power of supervision of each and every project of Supertech Ltd. and he must do the compliances. The counsels for the complainants further stated that IRP as well as management of M/s Sarv Realtors and M/s DSC Estate Developers are not disclosing the exact status of the projects Hues and Azalia. Further stated that as per affidavit filed by IRP, if the projects Hues and Azalia already stands transferred to M/s Sarv Realtors and M/s DSC Estate Developers on 31.03.2020 then why M/s Sarv Realtors and M/s DSC Estate Developers are not doing compliances, The Authority must direct them to do the same in the interest of the allottees. The counsel for M/s Sarv Realtors and M/s DSC Estate Developers and Mr.Mohit Arora states at bar that they have received all the assets and liabilities of the project “Hues and Azalia” in March 2020. Shri Rohit Arora - the counsel on behalf of M/s Sarv Realtors and M/s DSC Estate Developers further brought attention of the authority towards para No.5 page 79 of the order of the authority dated 29.11.2019 which is reproduced as under:- (v) All the assets and liabilities including customer receipts and project loans of whatsoever nature, in the Project “Supertech Hues and Azalia” in the name of Supertech Ltd be shifted to Sarv Realtors Pvt Ltd/DSC and others. However, even after the rectification, Supertech Ltd. will continue to remain jointly responsible for the units marketed and sold by it and shall be severally responsible if Sarv Realtors Pvt. Ltd/DSC and others fail to discharge its obligations towards the allottees. IRP of the company stated that the director of M/s Sarv Realtors and M/s DSC Estate Developers will file the exact status of the project as they have already committed during the proceedings that they have taken over the project on 31.03.2020 from M/s Supertech Ltd. The Authority hereby directs the authorized director of M/s Sarv Realtors and M/s DSC Estates to clarify the exact status of QPRs and updated status of registration of the project Hues and Azalia in the shape of affidavit and that they shall apply for registration /extension of these projects within next 20 days . In case they have not filed the reply to the complaint cases, in which they are impleaded, they will have to file the reply within 15 days. Part arguments heard. Matter be put up before the full bench on 27.05.2024 at 3.00 PM for further arguments.	SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA	View Order	25-Apr-2024
05-Mar-2024	PENDING	The complainant has moved an application bearing MA no. 55/2024 dated 24.01.2024 for early hearing of the present matter stating that the complainant is under immense pressure from the banks because of pending EMIs under subvention scheme and he is seeking refund of the deposited amount. On the last date of hearing i.e., 12.01.2024, it is observed by the authority that in view of orders of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India, NCLAT and affidavit submitted by IRP on 27.09.2023 in matters listed on 06.10.2023, it is clear that the CIR Process is continuing against the entire Corporate Debtor company, as a result of which the Moratorium imposed upon the entire Corporate Debtor company is also continuing and the continuation of any proceedings whatsoever, against the Corporate Debtor in any form is prohibited as per provisions of IBC Act, 2016. In view of the same, the matter was adjourned. The complainant has also moved an application dated 28.07.2023 seeking impleadment of Sarv Realtors Pvt. Ltd. as respondent in view of order dated 29.11.2019 in suo-moto matter bearing no. 5802/2019. In view of the above, the application is allowed and the registry is directed to issue notice to M/s Sarv Realtors Pvt. Ltd. to file reply reply within a period of three weeks and also to appear before the authority on the next date of hearing. Matter to be heard on the date when the similar matters of M/s Supertech Limited are listed and IRP for M/s Supertech Limited and Directors of M/s Sarv Realtors Pvt.Ltd. have been called to clarify the facts w.r.t. moratorium. Matter to come up on 19.4.2024 for further proceedings.	ARUN KUMAR VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA	View Order	29-Mar-2024
12-Jan-2024	PENDING	In view of orders of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India, NCLAT and affidavit submitted by IRP ON 27.09.2023 in matters listed on 06.10.2023, it is clear that the CIR Process is continuing against the entire Corporate Debtor company, as a result of which the Moratorium imposed upon the entire Corporate Debtor company is also continuing and the continuation of any proceedings whatsoever, against the Corporate Debtor in any form is prohibited as per provisions of IBC Act, 2016. In view of the same, the matters are adjourned to 19.04.2024 for further proceedings.	SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA	View Order	23-Jan-2024
06-Oct-2023	PENDING	The counsel for the respondent and the IRP present in person as per directions of the authority state that they have already filed the affidavit as well as status of construction of various projects, as per the directions of authority vide its order dated 25.08.2023. The affidavit was filed on 27.09.2023 and the construction status report was filed on 03.10.2023. The copy of the same has been handed over to all the concerned parties still if counsel of any concerned party has not received the same, the counsel for the respondent is hereby ready to hand over the copy of the same to the concerned complainant or his counsel. IRP present in person stated that moratorium is applicable on all the projects of Supertech Ltd. and the same had been granted by Hon’ble NCLT New Delhi on its order dated 25.03.2022. Further stated that an appeal was filed against this order by the Suspending Directors before Hon’ble NCLAT in appeal No.406 of 2022 which is still pending before the Hon’ble NCLAT. However an interim order was passed in that appeal stating that CoC was restricted to ECO village-II and all other projects of Supertech Ltd. were to be constructed under the supervision of IRP alongwith the assistance of ex-management employees and workmen vide its order dated 10.06.2022. Further on 12.09.2022 the Hon’ble NCLAT Delhi further passed an order “CIRP order has not been stayed, the moratorium is continuing”. Further, stated that the orders dated 10.06.2022 of NCLAT was challenged before Hon’ble SC which was heard by the Hon’ble SC and an interim order was issued upholding the orders dated 10.06.2022 of NCLAT. This interim order was passed by the Hon’ble SC on 11.05.2023 and it was further listed for hearing on 24.08.2023 but on that date due to any reason, the matter could not be taken up and the next date of hearing is still not notified. Further stated that the NCLAT is continuously hearing the appeal and the next date of hearing is 19.10.2023. Further stated that Hon’ble NCLAT vide its order dated 5.07.2023 categorically stated after taking into consideration the orders of Hon’ble SC that “In view of the fact that it is IRP who is under control of the entire CIRP in all projects, it is necessary that the status report which is submitted in the Court should be put on the website of the Supertech so that it can be assessed by everyone”. Further the counsel for the complainant in CR No.1730 of 2023 and CR No.2144/2021, 424/2022 and some other complaints states that project Azalia and Hues are not covered in the list of the projects in which moratorium is continuing, hence those should be taken up separately. Further IRP present in person states that he has already admitted the claims of various allottees from the projects Azalia and Hues as treating them as contingent liability of the corporate debtor i.e. Supertech Ltd. The counsel for the complainants states that they are not aware about the claims being asked for by the IRP of Supertech in case of the projects of Azalia and Hues. The counsel for the respondent and IRP present in person states that the claim of projects Azalia and Hues were admitted by him after the order dated 14.10.2022 of Hon’ble NCLAT. IRP present in person further states that they are still accepting the claims of allottees of Azalia and Hues for the purpose of verification. The authority hereby directs IRP to submit a copy of the claims admitted by him within a period of 15 days and the same may be uploaded on the website of the authority also. Complainants are free to file the response to the affidavit filed by IRP within 15 days. IRP to be present before the authority and co-operate as and when required just to safeguard interest of the allottees and subject to final directions of the Hon’ble NCLAT and Hon’ble SC. Arguments heard. Since the matter is sub-judice before the NCLAT and Hon’ble SC it is being adjourned to 12.01.2024 for further proceedings.	SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA	View Order	16-Oct-2023
26-Sep-2023	PENDING	The complainant has moved an application for revival of the above-said matter on 28.07.2023 wherein it is stated that the authority has adjourned sine die the present complaint vide order dated 03.03.2023 passed by authority till the further decisions of the Supreme Court. That the Hon’ble Supreme Court under Civil appeal no. 1925 of 2023 vide order dated 11.05.2023 had noted that it is in the best interest of the other projects if the same are kept as ‘on-going’ and thereby ordered the constitution of CoC only for the real estate project ‘Eco Village II’. The relevant para 10 is reproduced below for ready reference: In the light of the principles aforesaid, in our view, as at present, we should adopt the course which appears to carry lower risk of injustice, even if ultimately in the appeals, this Court may find otherwise or choose any other course. In that regard, the element of balance of convenience shall have its own significance. On one hand is the position that the Appellate Tribunal has adopted a particular course (which it had adopted in another matter too) while observing that the project-wise resolution may be started as a test to find out the success of such resolution. The result of the directions of the impugned order dated 10.06.2022 is that except Eco Village-II project, all other projects of the corporate debtor are to be kept as ongoing projects and the construction of all other projects is to be continued under the supervision of the IRP with the exmanagement, its employees and workmen. Infusion of funds by the promoter in different projects is to be treated as interim finance, regarding which total account is to be maintained by IRP. If at the present stage, on the submissions of the appellants, CoC is ordered to be constituted for the corporate debtor as a whole in displacement of the directions of the Appellate Tribunal, it is likely to affect those ongoing projects and thereby cause immense hardship to the home buyers while throwing every project into a state of uncertainty. On the other hand, as indicated before us, the other projects are being continued by the IRP and efforts are being made for infusion of funds with the active assistance of the ex-management but without creating any additional right in the ex-management. In our view, greater inconvenience is likely to be caused by passing any interim order of constitution of CoC in relation to the corporate debtor as a whole; and may cause irreparable injury to the home buyers. In this view of the matter, we are not inclined to alter the directions in the order impugned as regards the projects other than Eco Village-II. Further, the complainant submitted that the project “HUES”, where the subject unit of the complainant lies does not fall within the ambit of insolvency proceedings of Supertech Limited as the developing rights of the project “HUES” had been transferred from Supertech Limited to Sarv Realtors Pvt. Ltd. vide order dated 29.11.2019 of this Ld. Authority in suo-moto complaint no. CR/5802/2019.. In view of the above order passed by this authority and order dated 11.05.2023 of the Hon’ble Supreme Court, it is prayed by the complainant herein that the present matter be revived. Part arguments heard. The IRP is directed to clarify and submit an affidavit as to which projects are under moratorium as per directions of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India and other Courts before the next date of hearing. Further, IRP should submit a copy of updated status of the construction of various projects (the status which they must have uploaded on the website) under their supervision. After that the authority will take a view about further proceedings regarding the various complaints filed in the authority. Matter to come up on 6.10.2023 for further proceedings. Registry is directed to issue a notice to the respondent for filing reply of the application dated 28.7.2023 filed by the complainant before the due date of hearing.	ASHOK SANGWAN SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA	View Order	04-Oct-2023
10-Feb-2023	SINE DIE	The brief background of the case is as under: 1. The Union Bank of India had preferred a Company Petition CP(IB) bearing NO. 204/(ND) 2021 before NCLT under Section 7 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016 against M/s Supertech Ltd. for non-payment of outstanding debt. The NCLT was pleased to admit the insolvency petition by its order dated 25.03.2022. Vide this order the NCLT inter alia initiated CIRP against the corporate debtor, and appointed, Hitesh Goel as the Interim Resolution Professional for the corporate debtor and declared moratorium as per Section 14 of the IBC. 2. Mr. R.K. Arora, the suspended director of the corporate debtor filed an appeal bearing company appeal (AT) (Ins) no. 406 of 2022 on 07.04.2022 before NCLAT against the order dated 25.03.2022. The appeal was subsequently heard on multiple dates and NCLAT had continued the stay on constitution of the CoC till 10.06.2022. The NCLAT vide order dated 10.06.2022 modified the CoC stay order to the extent that the IRP may constitute the CoC only in relation to the project Eco-Village – II of the corporate debtor. 3. An application dated 26.07.2022 from Mr. Hitesh Goel IRP was received stating therein that though all the projects of the corporate debtor apart from ECO village - II would be kept as ongoing project, but the construction of the other projects would continue with overall supervision of IRP with the assistance of ex-management, its employees, and workmen. So, the imposition of moratorium under section 14 of IBC would continue and proceedings of all the cases listed before the authority be adjourned sine die. 4. Vide order dated 12.09.2022, the NCLAT has clarified that “the CIRP order has not been stayed. The Moratorium is continuing” and also vide order dated 14.10.2022, NCLAT made it clear that verification of the claim has to be with regard to all projects and is not only confined to Eco-village -II. The counsel for the respondent has produced a copy of order dated 31.01.2023 passed by NCLAT, Principal Bench, New Delhi passed in Company Appeal (AT) (Ins.) No.406 of 2022 and I.A. No.2246, 2646 and 2663 of 2022 in case titled as Ram Kishor Arora Suspended Director of Supertech Ltd. vs. Union of India and another which is re-produced as under:- Learned counsel for the parties have placed before us the order passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court dated 27.01.2023 which is to the following effect:- “taking note of the submissions sought to be made in these matters, we are clearly of the view that as at present, the offers said to have been made by the prospective resolution applicants may be evaluated and may be placed for consideration before the NCLAT but beyond that process, we would request the NCLAT to keep the proceedings in abeyance and await further order of this Court. List these maters on 16.02.2023”. In view of the aforesaid order of the Hon’ble Supreme Court, the appeal is adjourned to await further orders of Hon’ble Supreme Court. As per proceedings dated 12.08.2022 opinion of A. G. Haryana was sought, who has clearly opined vide his letter dated 28.11.2022 to adjourn sine die the matter. The IRP is directed to submit the status of case pending before the NCLAT within a week to this authority. In view of the above directions passed in order dated 31.01.2023, the matter is adjourned sine die. File be consigned to the registry.	SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA	View Order	03-Mar-2023
30-Sep-2022	PENDING	Vide orders dated 25.03.2022, NCLT New Delhi initiated CIRP against the respondent i.e., M/s Supertech Limited and appointed Mr. Hitesh Goel as IRP for the corporate debtor and declared moratorium as per section 14 of IBC. It led to filing an appeal in NCLAT against that order by Mr. R.K. Arora, one of the suspended Director. That order was stayed by NCLAT and constitution of CoC was stayed and observed that IRP may constituted the CoC only in relation to project ECO village-Il of the corporate debtor and that appeal is pending for 12.08.2022. Further an application dated 26.07.2022 from Mr. Hitesh Goel IRP has been received stating therein that though all the projects of the corporate debtor apart from ECO village - II would be kept as ongoing project, but the construction of the other projects would continue with overall supervision of IRP with the assistance of ex-management, its employees and workmen. So, the imposition of moratorium under section 14 of IBC would continue and proceedings of all the cases listed before the authority be adjourned sine die. But plea raised in this regard is devoid of merit. While passing order dated 25.03.2022 though NCLT initiated CIRP against the corporate debtor, but that order was stayed and modified vide orders dated 26.07.2022 by NCLAT by observing that the construction of all other projects shall continue with over all supervision of IRP with the assistance of its ex-management, its employees and workmen. Though clarification w.r.t this order is pending for 28.09.2022 before NCLAT but IRP would be treated as a promoter for all intents and purposes except for ECO village-Il against whom CIRP has been initiated and is pending. The authority has already requested to the Additional AG Haryana to examine whether as per reading of order dated 25.03.2022 and order dated 10.06.2022, moratorium in terms of Section 14 of the IBC is declared only against ECO village-Il project or in respect of all other projects of the corporate debtor i.e., M/s Supertech Limited. The requisite advice is still awaited. The counsel for the respondent had produced a copy of order passed by Hon’ble NCDRC wherein various complaints were listed and NCDRC after perusal of the order passed by NCLAT has deferred the matter for awaiting clarification from NCLAT regarding applicability of moratorium on project of M/s Supertech other than ECO village – 2. The counsel has further submitted that IRP has also moved an application before NCLAT for clarification and the case is fixed for 28.09.2022. The counsel for the respondent has produced a copy of orders dated 26.08.2022 in case titled as EA/141/2021 and other bunch matters were heard in NCDRC vide which the NCDRC has deferred the matter till 13.12.2022 keeping in view the NCLAT orders dated 25.03.2022. Now vide order dated 12.09.2022, the NCLAT has clarified that “the CIRP order has not been stayed. The Moratorium is continuing. The complainant has moved an application stating therein that letters from M/s Supertech in Hues project has been received and demanded the amount otherwise they threaten to cancel the unit and forfeit the amount which he has already paid since 2014. He has also placed a copy of email dated 22.09.2022 sent by M/s Supertech to clear the outstanding dues by 05.10.2022 on failure they shall be compelled to cancel the unit. The counsel for the complainant has requested that M/s Supertech cannot demand the outstanding amount in case the moratorium is continuing and IRP has been appointed. It is directed that IRP shall be present on the next date of hearing to explain the detailed status of the moratorium imposed upon M/s Supertech Ltd. and to explain whether M/s Supertech Ltd. can demand the outstanding amount in case moratorium is continuing on whole of the company. Further the authority shall also explore for engaging the services of an expert in NCLT matters to protect the rights and interest of allottees. Matter to come up on 10.02.2023 for further proceedings.	K K KHANDELWAL VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL	View Order	27-Oct-2022
31-Aug-2022	PENDING	Vide orders dated 25.03.2022, NCLT New Delhi initiated CIRP against the respondent i.e., M/s Supertech Limited and appointed Mr. Hitesh Goel as IRP for the corporate debtor and declared moratorium as per section 14 of IBC. It led to filing an appeal in NCLAT against that order by Mr. R.K. Arora, one of the suspended Director. That order was stayed by NCLAT and constitution of CoC was stayed and observed that IRP may constituted the CoC only in relation to project ECO village-Il of the corporate debtor and that appeal is pending for 12.08.2022. Further an application dated 26.07.2022 from Mr. Hitesh Goel IRP has been received stating therein that though all the projects of the corporate debtor apart from ECO village - II would be kept as ongoing project, but the construction of the other projects would continue with overall supervision of IRP with the assistance of ex-management, its employees and workmen. So, the imposition of moratorium under section 14 of IBC would continue and proceedings of all the cases listed before the authority be adjourned sine die. But plea raised in this regard is devoid of merit. While passing order dated 25.03.2022 though NCLT initiated CIRP against the corporate debtor, but that order was stayed and modified vide orders dated 26.07.2022 by NCLAT by observing that the construction of all other projects shall continue with over all supervision of IRP with the assistance of its ex-management, its employees and workmen. Though clarification w.r.t this order is pending for 29.08.2022 before NCLAT but IRP would be treated as a promoter for all intents and purposes except for ECO village-Il against whom CIRP has been initiated and is pending. The authority has already requested to the Additional AG Haryana to examine whether as per reading of order dated 25.03.2022 and order dated 10.06.2022, moratorium in terms of Section 14 of the IBC is declared only against ECO village-Il project or in respect of all other projects of the corporate debtor i.e., M/s Supertech Limited. The requisite advice is still awaited. The counsel for the respondent had produced a copy of order passed by Hon’ble NCDRC wherein various complaints were listed and NCDRC after perusal of the order passed by NCLAT has deferred the matter for awaiting clarification from NCLAT regarding applicability of moratorium on project of M/s Supertech other than ECO village – 2. The counsel has further submitted that IRP has also moved an application before NCLAT for clarification and the case is fixed for 12.09.2022. The counsel for the respondent has produced a copy of orders dated 26.08.2022 in case titled as EA/141/2021 filed in NCDRC vide which the NCDRC has deferred the matter till 13.12.2022 keeping in view the NCLAT orders dated 25.03.2022. Matter to come up on 30.09.2022 for further proceedings.	K K KHANDELWAL VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL	View Order	26-Sep-2022
23-Aug-2022	PENDING	Vide orders dated 25.03.2022, NCLT New Delhi initiated CIRP against the respondent i.e., M/s Supertech Limited and appointed Mr. Hitesh Goel as IRP for the corporate debtor and declared moratorium as per section 14 of IBC. It led to filing an appeal in NCLAT against that order by Mr. R.K. Arora, one of the suspended Director. That order was stayed by NCLAT and constitution of CoC was stayed and observed that IRP may constituted the CoC only in relation to project ECO village-Il of the corporate debtor and that appeal is pending for 12.08.2022. Further an application dated 26.07.2022 from Mr. Hitesh Goel IRP has been received stating therein that though all the projects of the corporate debtor apart from ECO village - II would be kept as ongoing project, but the construction of the other projects would continue with overall supervision of IRP with the assistance of ex-management, its employees and workmen. So, the imposition of moratorium under section 14 of IBC would continue and proceedings of all the cases listed before the authority be adjourned sine die. But plea raised in this regard is devoid of merit. While passing order dated 25.03.2022 though NCLT initiated CIRP against the corporate debtor, but that order was stayed and modified vide orders dated 26.07.2022 by NCLAT by observing that the construction of all other projects shall continue with over all supervision of IRP with the assistance of its ex-management, its employees and workmen. Though clarification w.r.t this order is pending for 29.08.2022 before NCLAT but IRP would be treated as a promoter for all intents and purposes except for ECO village-Il against whom CIRP has been initiated and is pending. The authority has already requested to the Additional AG Haryana to examine whether as per reading of order dated 25.03.2022 and order dated 10.06.2022, moratorium in terms of Section 14 of the IBC is declared only against ECO village-Il project or in respect of all other projects of the corporate debtor i.e., M/s Supertech Limited. The requisite advice is still awaited. Meanwhile, the authority may fix up matter for the date subsequent to the date fixed in this matter before NCLAT on 29.08.2022. Matter to come up on 31.08.2022 for further proceedings.	K K KHANDELWAL VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL	View Order	15-Sep-2022
28-Jan-2022	PENDING	In view of judgment dated 11.11.2021 in title- M/s Newtech Promoters and Developers Pvt Ltd. Vs State of UP & Ors. Etc. passed by the Apex Court, this forum has no jurisdiction to adjudicate the complaint in hands.File be transferred to the Authority. Reader is directed to send the file immediately.	RAJINDER KUMAR	---	---
08-Dec-2021	PENDING	MATTER IS ADJOURNED TO 28.01.2022.	RAJINDER KUMAR	---	---
09-Nov-2021	PENDING	Adjudicating Officer is on leave, matter is adjourned to 08.12.2021.	RAJINDER KUMAR	View Order	09-Nov-2021
03-Aug-2021	PENDING	Copy of written reply supplied to the complainant. 2. Counsel for the respondent requests for adjournment stating he is not feeling well today. Not opposed. 3. To come on 09.11.2021 for arguments.	RAJINDER KUMAR	View Order	06-Aug-2021
20-Apr-2021	PENDING	Due to increase in the Covid-19 cases in and around the area of the Authority, the case is not being taken up for hearing. Hence, as per directions of the Hon’ble Authority, it is being adjourned to 03.08.2021 for the proceedings already fixed. 2. Both the parties be informed accordingly through e-mail.	SUBHASH CHAND GOYAL	View Order	22-Apr-2021
05-Mar-2021	PENDING	In pursuance to notice, both the parties put in appearance through their respective counsel. 2. Copy of written reply supplied to the claimant through the counsel. Let it be filed before the Registry within 15 days and the matter be put up on 20.04.2021 for arguments.	SUBHASH CHAND GOYAL	---	---
09-Feb-2021	PENDING	In pursuance to notice, the respondent put in appearance through its counsel. 2. None is present on behalf of the complainant. A notice in this regard was sent to them through e-mail but none has turned up. In order to avoid any ambiguity. Let fresh notice for the presence of complainant as well as his counsel through e-mail be issued for 05.03.2021.	SUBHASH CHAND GOYAL	View Order	18-Feb-2021
21-Oct-2020	PENDING	THE MATTER IS ADJOURNED TO 09.02.2021	SUBHASH CHAND GOYAL	---	---
31-Aug-2020	PENDING	DUE TO PREVAILING COVID-19 PANDEMIC, THE MATTER IS ADJOURNED TO 21.10.2020	SUBHASH CHAND GOYAL	View Order	31-Aug-2020
01-Jul-2020	PENDING	THE CASE IS ADJOURNED TO 31.08.2020	SUBHASH CHAND GOYAL	---	---
15-Apr-2020	PENDING	THE CASE IS ADJOURNED TO 01.07.2020	SUBHASH CHAND GOYAL	---	---
26-Feb-2020	PENDING	THE CASE IS ADJOURNED TO 15.04.2020	SUBHASH CHAND GOYAL	View Order	28-Feb-2020
08-Jan-2020	FIRST HEARING	THE CASE IS ADJOURNED TO 26.02.2020	SUBHASH CHANDER KUSH SAMIR KUMAR	View Order	10-Jan-2020