Comprehensive Complaint Details
Complaint Detail:RERA-GRG-3654-2024
Party Dtls Self / Adv Name District Current Status Next Date of Hearing Complaint Dispatched Complaint Dispatched On Dispatched Tracking Id Complaint Dispatched Remarks First-Hearing/Scrutinized Remarks View Notice
HARERA GURUGRAM THROUGH NEERAJ GAUTAM V/S
RISHALI DEVELOPERS LLP
Self GURUGRAM DISPOSED NOT REQUIRED Yes 19-Jul-2024 RERA-GRG-3654-2024 HAND RECEIVED FIRST HEARING
Notice Details
Notice Number Remarks Dispatching Date Dispatch Id View Notice
First Notice HAND RECEIVED 19-Jul-2024 RERA-GRG-3654-2024
Complaint Listing Details
Date of Hearing Status Proceedings of the day Bench Order Order Uploaded On
10-Oct-2024 DISPOSED Ms. Deepika (Planning Executive) briefed the facts of the case. Sh. Saurabh Mishra, Sr. Manager, Legal is present on behalf of the promoter and states that a reply dated 05.08.2024 has been submitted by the promoter.  The AR of the promoter states that the BG demanded by the office of DTCP was deposited by the promoter on 15.06.2023 and the promoter followed up the matter with office of DTCP for getting the approval at the earliest and the final approval was obtained on 17.07.2023. It is a matter of fact that as per clause (G)(ii), of the registration it was clearly stated as under:-  “The promoter has submitted cheque No.001000 dated 22.03.2023 of ICICI bank amounting to Rs. 25 lacs as a security amount to submit the approved service plans and estimates in the Authority within three months. This bank guarantee shall be forfeited in case the promoter fails to submit the approval within the stipulated time.” It was further stated in clause 3 of the registration certificate as under:- “If the above mentioned conditions are not fulfilled/compliances are not made by the promoter, the Authority may take necessary action against the promoter including revoking the registration granted therein, as per the Act and the rules and regulations made thereunder.” In view of the facts and circumstances above, notwithstanding the contentions of the promoter, it is clear that the promoter has obtained the registration of the project subject to certain compliances and has failed to comply with condition at Clause (G)(ii) above as the Service Plans and Estimates were not submitted within the stipulated timeline. It is also noted that the Authority in its 137th meeting held on 01.01.2024 has taken a decision at agenda item no. 137.11 as under: “The authority discussed at length and taking a serious view in the matter the Hon’ble Chairman directed that compliances by the promoters must be made without fail within the timeline of conditional registration failing which the BG/ Security be forfeited and further action be initiated as per the provisions of the Act.” Consequently, the Security amount deposited by the promoter for the above compliance is liable to be and is hereby forfeited. Since the compliance has now been made, although with a delay, the case is file. ASHOK SANGWAN View Order 19-May-2025
12-Sep-2024 PENDING Matter is adjourned to 10.10.2024. ASHOK SANGWAN --- ---
30-Aug-2024 PENDING THE MATTER IS ADJOURNED TO 12.09.2024 ASHOK SANGWAN --- ---
16-Aug-2024 FIRST HEARING THE MATTER IS ADJOURNED TO 30.08.2024 ASHOK SANGWAN View Order 23-Aug-2024
Complaint Final Judgement Details
Date of Judgement Party Details Judgement Uploading Date View Judgement
10-Oct-2024 HARERA GURUGRAM THROUGH NEERAJ GAUTAM V/S
RISHALI DEVELOPERS LLP
--- ---
Documents Submitted
Dak ID Receiving Date Submitted By Remarks
76798 06/08/2024 SAURAV MISHRA REPLY TO SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE- 3654-2024, DT: 19.07.2024.
76077 26/07/2024 HARERA GURUGRAM THROUGH NEERAJ NEW COMPLAINT
85032 10/01/2025 SAURABH MISHRA CERTIFIED COPY OF SOU-MOTO COMPLAINT DOCUMENT.