| Party Dtls | Self / Adv Name | District | Current Status | Next Date of Hearing | Complaint Dispatched | Complaint Dispatched On | Dispatched Tracking Id | Complaint Dispatched Remarks | First-Hearing/Scrutinized Remarks | View Notice |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ARCHANA SACHDEVA THROUGH POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER AMRIT LAL SACHDEVA V/S BPTP LTD. |
NILOTPAL SHYAM SHIVALI AND RAKESH KUMAR SAHU | GURUGRAM | DISPOSED | NOT REQUIRED | Not Yet | FIRST HEARING | -- |
| S No. | Complaint-ID | Complaint-Type | Status | Next Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RERA-GRG-5490-2023 | Execution | ONLINE COMPLAINT NOT YET RECEIVED AT OFFICE | NA |
| 2 | RERA-GRG-5398-2023 | Execution | DISMISSED | NA |
| Date of Hearing | Status | Proceedings of the day | Bench | Order | Order Uploaded On |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17-Aug-2023 | DISPOSED | Order pronounced. The respondent shall pay delayed possession interest at the prescribed rate i.e., 10.75 % per annum for every month of delay on the amount paid by the complainant from due date of possession till the date of offer of possession plus two months as per proviso to section 18(1) of the Act read with rule 15 of the rules. Detailed order will follow. Matter stands disposed off. File be consigned to the registry. | VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL | View Order | 27-Aug-2023 |
| 18-Jul-2023 | RESERVED | The present complaint has been received on 16.05.2022 and the reply was received on 30.09.2022. Succinct facts of the case as per complaint and reply are as under: S. No. Heads Description 1. Name of the project “Spacio’, Sector 37D, Gurugram, Haryana 2. Project area 43.588 acres 3. DTCP license no. 83 of 2008 issued on 05.04.2008 Validity of license 04.04.2025 Name of the license holder of 83 of 2008 M/s Super Belts and 4 others Licensed area 23.814 acres 4. RERA registration number 300 of 2017 dated 13.10.2017 Validity of registration certificate w.e.f. 13.10.2017 till 12.10.2020 5. Date of execution of flat buyer’s agreement 23.07.2012 (on page no. 37 of complaint) 6. Date of allotment Letter 25.07.2011 (page no. 28 of complaint) 7 Booking application 10.05.2011 (page no. 56 of reply) 8. Unit no. N-1405, 14th floor, Tower-N (page no. 44 of complaint) 9. Unit area admeasuring 1800 sq. ft. (on page no. 37 of complaint) 10. Revised unit area 1865 sq. ft. (a on page no. 172 of reply) 11. Total consideration Rs 95,64,347/- 12. Total amount paid by the complainant Rs. 71,43,211/- 13. Due date of delivery of possession as per clause 3.1 of the flat buyer’s agreement i.e. within a period of 36 months from the date of booking/registration of flat and grace period of 180 days after the expiry of 36 months, for applying and obtaining the occupation certificate. 10.05.2014 Note: Grace period is not included 14. Occupation certificate date 30.07.2020 (on page no. 169 of reply) 15. Offer of possession 05.08.2020 ( page no. 172 of reply) Arguments heard. Order reserved. Matter to come up on 17.08.2023 for pronouncement of order. | VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL | View Order | 24-Jul-2023 |
| 31-Jan-2023 | PENDING | Due to paucity of time matter could not be heard. Interims direction to continue till next date of hearing. Matter to come up on 18.07.2023 for further proceedings. | VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL ASHOK SANGWAN SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA | View Order | 08-Feb-2023 |
| 30-Sep-2022 | PENDING | The present complaint was filed on 16.05.2022 and registered as complaint no. 1985 of 2022. On the last date of hearing, Sh. Venkat Rao Advocate, counsel for the respondent appeared and was directed to file reply by 10.06.2022 however, no reply has been filed till date. The counsel for the respondent has handed over a copy of reply to the counsel for the complainant during proceedings. The respondent is directed to file reply within one week i.e., 07.10.2022 in the registry along with a cost of Rs. 5,000/-to be paid to the complainant. Last opportunity is being granted. In case the reply is not filed within the time allowed, the defence of the respondent may be struck off. The counsel for the complainant requests for issuance of interim direction against non- cancellation and non- creation of any third party rights as the complainant - allottee has already paid more than the basic amount demanded as per terms and conditions of the BBA and now some additional demands have been raised without adjusting DPC amount. The counsel for the respondent clarifies that the allottee has paid an amount of Rs.71,43,211/- against a final demand of Rs.95,64,347/-. The counsel for the complainant clarifies that this demand is without adjustment of delayed possession charges and the basic sale price was only to the tune of Rs.58,27,250/- alongwith charges for development, EDC, PLC, cost escalation, car parking, electrification, STP, interest on delayed payment, fire fighting and power back up charges, club membership, service tax/GST/VAT, stamp duty charges and additional area increased, if any. The respondent is directed to not create any third party rights till next date of hearing and no coercive action shall be taken. Further the counsel for the complainant is directed to supply a complete copy of the complaint including copy of power of attorney in favour of present complainant as per law. Matter to come up on 31.01.2023 for further proceedings. | K K KHANDELWAL VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL | View Order | 15-Oct-2022 |
| 27-May-2022 | FIRST HEARING | The present complaint was filed on 16.05.2022 and registered as complaint no. 1985 of 2022. As per the registry, complainant has sent copy of complaint through speed post as well as through email and proof regarding having the delivery of the complaint made to the respondents were submitted by the complainant as available in the file. The registry of the authority also sent a notice along with a copy of the complaint through speed post of which delivery is not confirmed yet as per the tracking report of the speed post available in the file. Registry has also sent the notice along with a copy of the complaint through email at the following email addresses bdutta48@gmail.com deepak.pannu@bptp.com customercare@bptp.com shiv.nalsar@gmail.com . The same is shown to have been delivered on the above email address as per the report available in the file. It is proper service of the notice. However, no reply has been received on behalf of the respondents till date. The counsel for the respondents requests for a short adjournment for filing of the reply. The respondents are directed to file reply within two weeks i.e., by 10.06.2022 in the registry with a copy to the complainant. Last opportunity is being granted. In case reply is not filed within the time allowed, the defense of the respondents may be struck off. The Matter to come up on 30.09.2022 for further proceedings. | K K KHANDELWAL VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL | View Order | 09-Jun-2022 |
| Date of Judgement | Party Details | Judgement Uploading Date | View Judgement |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17-Aug-2023 | ARCHANA SACHDEVA THROUGH POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER AMRIT LAL SACHDEVA V/S BPTP LTD. |
14-Sep-2023 |
|
| Dak ID | Receiving Date | Submitted By | Remarks |
|---|---|---|---|
| 32574 | 16/05/2022 | NILOTPAL SHYAM SHIVALI | NEW COMPLAINT |
| 41903 | 30/09/2022 | SIDDHANT YADAV | REPLY RECEIVED |
Web Information Manager
Shri Arvind Mehtani,Executive Director, HRERA
Mini Secretariat, New Office Block,
2nd & 3rd Floor ,Sector-1,
Panchkula,
Haryana- 134114,India
Email: hrerapkl[dash]hry[at]gov[dot]in
Telephone: +91 172-2584232,2585232
Website Designed and Developed By National Informatics Centre (NIC) and Owned by HRERA PANCHKULA & HRERA GURUGRAM Jointly
© 2018 Copyright. All Rights Reserved.