| Party Dtls | Self / Adv Name | District | Current Status | Next Date of Hearing | Complaint Dispatched | Complaint Dispatched On | Dispatched Tracking Id | Complaint Dispatched Remarks | First-Hearing/Scrutinized Remarks | View Notice |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KAMLESH JAIN AND MANISH JAIN V/S CLASSIC INFRASOLUTIONS PVT LTD |
ARJUN AGGARWAL | GURUGRAM | DISPOSED | NOT REQUIRED | Not Yet | FIRST HEARING | -- |
| S No. | Complaint-ID | Complaint-Type | Status | Next Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RERA-GRG-3067-2025 | Execution | PENDING | 21-Apr-2027 |
| Date of Hearing | Status | Proceedings of the day | Bench | Order | Order Uploaded On |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18-Oct-2024 | DISPOSED | The present complaint was filed on 12.04.2022 and reply has been filed on 27.01.2023. The counsel for the complainants have filed rejoinder on 01.09.2023. S. No. Heads Information 1. Name and location of the project “Paras Irene”, Sector-70A, Gurugram, Haryana 2. Nature of the project Commercial Project 3. DTCP license no. and validity status 16 of 2009 dated 01.06.2009 valid up to 28.05.2024 4. RERA registered/ not registered and validity status Not registered 5. Unit no. 01, 12th A floor, N-03 - Tower (Page no. 26 of the complaint) 6. Unit admeasuring 2150 sq. ft. (Page no. 26 of the complaint) 7. Date of booking 09.05.2012 (As per page 17 of complaint) 8. Date of allotment 09.05.2012 (As per page 17 of complaint) 9. Date of flat buyer’s agreement 11.01.2013 (Page 22 of complaint) 10. Possession clause 3. The seller proposes to handover the possession of the apartment to the purchaser within a period of 42 months with an additional grace period of 6 months from the date of execution of this agreement or date of obtaining all licenses or approval for commencement of construction whichever is later subject to force majeure. (Emphasis supplied) 11. Due date of delivery of possession 11.01.2017 (Calculated from the date of agreement as the date of approval of construction is not available in fil ) 12. Total consideration Rs. 1,38,12,379/- (As per demand letter dated 19.02.2016 on page 68 of complaint) 13. Total amount paid by the complainants Rs. 63,22,909/- (As per page 68 of complaint and also as per page 6 of complaint ) 14. Occupation Certificate 23.06.2017 (As per page 110 of reply) 15. Demand letters 21.05.2012,08.08.2013,15.12.2013, 03.03.2014,28.05.2014, 29.11.2014, 01.12.2015, 19.02.2016, 08.04.2016, 20.05.2016, (As per page70-79 of reply) 16. Pre cancellation letter 31.08.2015 (Page 105 of reply) 17. Cancellation Letter 03.08.2016 (Page 75 of complaint) – on account of non-payment On the last date of hearing, the respondent had undertaken to supply certain details regarding the payment of Rs.40 Lakhs through cheque which was dishonoured and correspondence w.r.t the submission of the same. No such document has been filed till date. The cancellation of the unit on 03.08.2016 cannot be challenged at this belated stage and the same would be barred by limitation. However, the respondent has not refunded any amount of the complainant after cancellation of the unit. Arguments heard. The respondent is directed to refund the amount deposited by the complainant after deduction of 10% amount of sale consideration alongwith interest at the prescribed rate of interest i.e. 11.10% per annum from the date of cancellation of the unit i.e. 03.08.2016 till its realization. Order pronounced. Detailed order will follow. Matter stands disposed off. | ASHOK SANGWAN | View Order | 25-Oct-2024 |
| 02-Aug-2024 | PENDING | Proxy counsel for the complainant seeks short adjournment as themain arguing counsel is not available today to argue the matter. Matter is adjourned to 18.10.2024 on the request of proxy counsel for complainant. | SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA | View Order | 06-Aug-2024 |
| 31-May-2024 | PENDING | The proxy counsel for the complainant requests for a short adjournment as the arguing counsel is not available today. Request is allowed. Matter to come up on 02.08.2024 for further proceedings. | SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA | View Order | 04-Jun-2024 |
| 15-Mar-2024 | PENDING | The present complaint was filed on 12.04.2022 and reply has been filed on 27.01.2023. The counsel for the complainants have filed rejoinder on 01.09.2023. The complainants were allotted a unit in the project of respondent “Paras Irene”, in Sector 70A, Gurugram vide allotment letter dated 09.05.2012 for a total sum of Rs. 1,34,30,858/-. Also vide dated 11.01.2013 buyer’s agreement was executed between the parties, the complainants started paying the amount due against the allotted unit and paid a total sum of Rs. 63,22,909/-which is 47.07% of the sale consideration. 1. The counsel for the complainant is seeking refund as the due date of handing over of the posseswion was 11.1.2017 and the complainant cannot be forced to wait endlessly. 2. The counsel for the respondent staes that although the unit was cancelled in 3.8.2016 which is at page 75 Annexure’ J’ of the complaint but further stated that the complainant further made payment of Rs. 40 lakh on 31.10.2018 which was cheque no.044104 dated 8.8.2018 which got bounced on 3.1.2019 and that bounce cheque/bank statement of the respondent shall be submitted within a week in the registry of the authroity alongwith the memo affixed on the cheque by the bankers. Further stated that she shall be filing the correspndence w.r.t. the submission of above mentioned cheque of Rs. 40 lakh alongwith the proof of bounced cheque within one week. 3. Part arguments heard. 4. Both the parties are directed to file written submissions within a period of two weeks after supplying a copy to each other. 5. Matter to come up on 31.5.2024 for final arguments. | SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA | View Order | 21-Mar-2024 |
| 01-Dec-2023 | PENDING | The present complaint was filed on 12.04.2022 and reply has been filed on 27.01.2023. Counsel for the complainants have filed rejoinder on 01.09.2023. The proxy counsel for the complainant requests for a short adjournment as the arguing counsel is not available today. Request is allowed. Matter to come up on 15.03.2024 for further proceedings. | SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA | View Order | 11-Dec-2023 |
| 10-Nov-2023 | PENDING | Due to administrative exigency, the matter is adjourned to 01.12.2023 for further proceedings. | SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA | View Order | 16-Nov-2023 |
| 01-Sep-2023 | PENDING | On the last date of hearing, the proxy counsel for the complainant stated that they want to file re-joinder to the complaint. Request was allowed. The counsel for the complainant was directed to file rejoinder within 2 weeks with an advance copy to the counsel for the respondent. The rejoinder has not been filed till date. The counsel for the complainant states that rejoinder has been sent to the respondent through mail, however the copy of the same has not been submitted to the Authority. The counsel for the complainant is directed to file the same in the authority today itself. The counsel for the respondent states that the mail said to have been sent by the counsel for the complainant on 29.08.2023 is not yet received by the respondent. The counsel for the complainant is hereby directed to re-send the copy of re-joinder to the reply, to the counsel for the respondent within 4 days. Matter to come up on 10.11.2023 for further proceedings. | SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA | View Order | 05-Sep-2023 |
| 28-Apr-2023 | PENDING | The proxy counsel for the complainant states that they want to file rejoinder to the complaint. Request is allowed. The counsel for the complainant is directed to file rejoinder within 2 weeks with an advance copy to the counsel for the respondent. Matter to come up on 01.09.2023 for further proceedings | SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA | View Order | 30-May-2023 |
| 25-Jan-2023 | PENDING | The present complaint has been received on 12.04.2022 and the reply has not been filed till date. On the last date of the hearing the counsel for the respondent was directed to file a reply within seven days. However, no reply has been filed till date. The counsel for the complainant states that as per proceedings dated 28.09.2022 the respondent was obligated to file reply within one week and to pay cost of Rs.5,000/- to the complainant but the respondent has failed to do so till now. The counsel for the respondent has supplied a copy of reply to the counsel for the complainant during proceedings alongwith cost of Rs.5,000/- in cash which is paid to the counsel for the complainant and requests for a short adjournment for filing of the reply in the registry of the authority. The respondent is directed to file the reply within 3 days. The counsel for the respondent further states that they were trying to amicably settle the matter but nothing could happen. However, the counsel for the complainant denied regarding any amicable talks and stated that they were never contacted him. Matter to come up on 28.04.2023 for further proceedings. | VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA | View Order | 23-Feb-2023 |
| 28-Sep-2022 | PENDING | The present complaint was filed on12.04.2022and registered as complaint No. 1591 of 2022. As per the registry, complainant has sent copy of complaint along with annexures through speed post as well as through email and proof regarding having the delivery of the complaint along with annexures made to the respondent has been submitted by the complainant as available in the file. The registry of the authority sent a notice with a copy of the complaint along with annexures through speed post of which delivery was confirmed on 06.05.2022 to both the respondents as per the tracking report of the speed post available in the file. Registry has also sent the notice along with a copy of the complaint through email at following email address: manishjaingp@yahoo.com , arjun@satyalaw.com info@parasbuildtech.com and the same are shown to have been delivered on the above email address as per the report available in the file. Written reply has not been filed by the respondent. Ms. Priyanka Agarwal Advocate has appeared on behalf of the respondent today and filed memo of appearance. The counsel for the respondent requests for a adjournment for filing of the reply. The respondent is directed to file reply within 7 days i.e. by 05.10.2022 in the registry with a copy to the complainant subject to payment of Rs.5,000/- to be paid to the complainant. Last opportunity is being granted. In case reply is not filed within the time allowed, the defense of the respondent may struck off. Matter to come up on 25.01.2023 for further proceedings. | K K KHANDELWAL VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL | View Order | 19-Nov-2022 |
| 24-May-2022 | FIRST HEARING | The present complaint was filed on 12.04.2022 and registered as complaint no. 1591 of 2022. As per the registry, complainant has sent copy of complaint along with annexures through speed post as well as through email and proof regarding having the delivery of the complaint along with annexures made to the respondent has been submitted by the complainant as available in the file. The registry of the authority sent a notice with a copy of the complaint along with annexures through speed post of which delivery confirmed on 06.05.2022 as per the tracking report of the speed post available in the file. Registry has also sent the notice along with a copy of the complaint through email at following email address: info@parasbuildtech.com and the same has been delivered as per the report available in the file. It is presumed that service of the notice is complete. No written reply has been filed so far. The AR of the respondent requests for an adjournment for filing of the reply as the complaint has been received very recently and hence, reply could not be filed. The respondent is directed to file reply within two weeks i.e. by 07.06.2022 in the registry with a copy to the complainant. Last opportunity is being granted. In case reply is not filed within the time allowed, the defense of the respondent may struck off. The matter to come up on 28.09.2022 for further proceedings. | K K KHANDELWAL VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL | View Order | 08-Jul-2022 |
| Date of Judgement | Party Details | Judgement Uploading Date | View Judgement |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18-Oct-2024 | KAMLESH JAIN AND MANISH JAIN V/S CLASSIC INFRASOLUTIONS PVT LTD |
18-Nov-2024 |
|
| Dak ID | Receiving Date | Submitted By | Remarks |
|---|---|---|---|
| 31018 | 12/04/2022 | ARJUN AGGARWAL | NEW COMPLAINT |
| 58090 | 01/09/2023 | SATYA LAW CHAMBERS | REJOINDER BY THE COMPLAINANT |
| 93225 | 23/06/2025 | ARJUN AGGARWAL ADV | CERTIFIED COPY OF ORDER. |
| 48314 | 27/01/2023 | GREEN AGARWAL AND ASSOCIATES | REPLY RECEIVED |
Web Information Manager
Shri Sunil Hooda,Secretary(Acting), HRERA
Mini Secretariat, New Office Block,
2nd & 3rd Floor ,Sector-1,
Panchkula,
Haryana- 134114,India
Email: hrerapkl[dash]hry[at]gov[dot]in
Telephone: +91 172-2584232,2585232
Website Designed and Developed By National Informatics Centre (NIC) and Owned by HRERA PANCHKULA & HRERA GURUGRAM Jointly
© 2018 Copyright. All Rights Reserved.