Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority

Comprehensive Complaint Details

Complaint Detail:RERA-GRG-659-2020

Party Dtls	Self / Adv Name	District	Current Status	Next Date of Hearing	Complaint Dispatched	Complaint Dispatched On	Dispatched Tracking Id	Complaint Dispatched Remarks	First-Hearing/Scrutinized Remarks	View Notice
GREENOPOLIS WELFARE ASSOCIATION V/S ORRIS INFRASTRUCTURE PVT LTD	VENKET RAO	GURUGRAM	PENDING	07-Nov-2022	Not Yet				Hearing date 03.10.2019	--

Complaint Listing Details

Date of Hearing	Status	Proceedings of the day	Bench	Order	Order Uploaded On
07-Nov-2022	PENDING	It is pointed out that case file has already been sent to the Authority on requisition received from it. Parties may appear before the Authority on date fixed. learned counsel for DH submits that this fact was not within his knowledge.		---	---
16-Sep-2022	PENDING	Both of learned counsels seek time to file written submissions. Be filed before next date. To come on 07.11.2022 at 2.00p.m.	RAJINDER KUMAR	---	---
01-Aug-2022	PENDING	Adjudicating Officer on leave, adjourned to 16.09.2022.	RAJINDER KUMAR	---	---
18-Jul-2022	PENDING	Adjudicating Officer on leave, adjourned to 01.08.2022.	RAJINDER KUMAR	---	---
21-Apr-2022	PENDING	It is submitted by learned counsel for JD that certain development works are going at the project site. The Authority has passed order dated 12.04.2022 giving directions to his client to develop/complete the project. Learned counsel seeks adjournment so that he could seek necessary directions from the Authority. All this is stronly objected by the learned counsel for DH. According to him, there is no stay of proceedings till date. Keeping in view all this, I think it proper to adjourn the matter. To come on 18.07.2022 for further proceedings.	RAJINDER KUMAR	View Order	02-May-2022
06-Apr-2022	PENDING	On joint request, matter is adjourned to 21.04.2022 for arguments.	RAJINDER KUMAR	View Order	09-Apr-2022
25-Mar-2022	PENDING	This is a petition seeking execution of order dated 12.09.2019 passed by the Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority(in brief Authority). During the course of proceedings, vide order dated 03.10.2019, a property i.e. Hotel Plot bearing No.A-31a, District Centre, Nehru Place, New Delhi was ordered to be attached by the Authority, to realise the decretal amount. ` This is an application filed by M/s Lavender Infra Projects Pvt Ltd., with request to recall that order and to release aforesaid plot from attachment. It is submitted by learned counsel for applicant that said plot is owned by his client i.e. M/s Lavender Infra Projects Pvt Ltd. and the latter got its title through conveyance deed dated 19.09.2011. Original conveyance deed is shown by learned counsel, a copy of same has been filed alongwith the application. As per learned counsel, when said plot is owned by his client, same could not have been attached in this case, his client is not a judgment-debtor. Learned counsel representing DH objected the application. It is submitted by him that said property was attached on the asking of JD-2 i.e. M/s 3C Shelters Private Ltd. An affidavit was also filed by the latter, verifying that same was being dedicated voluntarily by JD-2. It was mentioned that JD was in the process of buying said plot on the basis of an agreement. Asa this is reflected in order dated 23.01.2019, passed by the Authority. None of parties could show that said plot was actually owned by M/s 3 C Shelters Pvt Ltd. On the other hand, as mentioned above, conveyance deed is in favour of M/s Lavender Infra Projects Pvt Ltd.(applicant). When, there is no evidence to show that said property was actually owned by JD-2, there was no reason to attach said property to realise decretal amount. Applicant appears to have good title over said plot. Application is thus allowed and order dated 03.10.2019 of the authority attaching said plot is hereby recalled. It is contended by learned counsel for JD-2 (M/s Orris Infrastructure Pvt Ltd.) that an application filed by his client is still pending for disposal. He requests short adjournment for arguments on it. Not opposed by learned counsel for DH. Request is thus allowed. To come on 06.04.2022 at 2.00p.m.(as requested) for arguments on application and further proceedings.	RAJINDER KUMAR	View Order	30-Mar-2022
10-Mar-2022	PENDING	Application filed by Ms Lavender Infraprojects Pvt Ltd. was listed for today. Learned counsel for DH as well as of JD-I request for short adjournment to file reply to same. Not opposed. Request is allowed. Let reply if any be filed till next date with copy to the applicant. To come for arguments on this application as well as on application filed by the JD No.1 on 25.03.2022.	RAJINDER KUMAR	View Order	05-Apr-2022
03-Mar-2022	PENDING	As per learned counsel representing R-1 she has not received a copy of application seeking restoration of earlier application made by the applicant. Learned counsel for latter undertakes to supply copy of same today itself. Learned counsel for JD requests for short adjournment for arguments on execution petition stating that she is making arrangements to appear before this forum personally. She has given birth to a male baby recently. Not opposed. Allowed. To come on 10.03.2022 for arguments.	RAJINDER KUMAR	View Order	05-Apr-2022
14-Feb-2022	PENDING	None for applicant. Application stands dismissed. Arguments heard in part. To come for remaining arguments on 03.03.2022. At 11.45p.m. At this stage learned counsel for applicant put in appearance and he has been apprised about the proceedings. To come for remaining arguments on 03.03.2022.	RAJINDER KUMAR	---	---
11-Feb-2022	PENDING	THE MATTER IS ADJOURNED TO 14.02.2022	RAJINDER KUMAR	---	---
14-Dec-2021	PENDING	This is a petition seeking execution of order dated 03.10.2019, passed by the Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Gurugram(in brief ‘the Authority’). On request made by the Decree Holders ,the Authority, vide order dated 03.10.2019 , directed attachment of property No.A-3a, District Centre Phase II, Nehru Place, New Delhi stated to a hotel plot. Heard on an application filed by M/s Delhi Brass & Metal Works Pvt Ltd. seeking vacation of said order, attaching plot described above. It is submitted by learned counsel for applicant that said plot has been mortgaged with his clients i.e. applicants by its owner i.e. Lavender Infra Projects Pvt Ltd. a private limited company. The Latter had approached the applicants in July/August, 2015 with a prayer for loan facility of Rs.49.50 crores for construction/development of its projects. Same agreed to provide its property i.e. a hotel plot mentioned above as security for repayment of loan facility. The applicants extended loan facility as sought by said Lavender Infra, at an interest rate of 24% p.a. An equitable mortgage on this property was created in favour of his clients, by depositing original title deed i.e. allotment letter, payments receipts, conveyance deed etc. Apart from the same, an agreement for sale was also executed by M/s Lavender Infra in favour of applicants. Unpaid loan amount was agreed to be treated as sale consideration, paid by the applicants. A separate loan agreement dated 24.08.2015, agreement to sell date 24.08.2015, agreement/affidavits of share-holders of M/s Lavender Infra, were also executed. As M/s Lavender Infra did not repay the loan amount plus interest. His client i.e. applicants have become owners of said property. Copies of agreement etc have been put on file. Even otherwise, same being mortgagee of said plot, applicants have prior interest than the decree holders. It is further plea of counsel for applicants that even Haryana Real Estate Appellate Tribunal while hearing an Appeal No.158/2019 relating to the present execution petition, mentioned about encumbrances upon the plot. The relevant para i.e. Para 62 of order is reproduced is here as under: “It was further mentioned in affidavit dated 23.01.2019 that they dedicated properties worth more than Rs.200 crores but it is an admitted fact that this arrangement could not mature due to the default of t he respondent No.2, as it could not get the consent of the lenders and such properties were under encumbrances…….” Learned counsel representing the JD/Respondent No.1 & 2 have objections. According to them, simply on the basis of agreement to sell, the applicants cannot claim to be owners of said plot. True, it is well settled that an agreement to sell does not create any title till the sale deed etc is executed. In this way, the applicants cannot claim owners of plot mentioned above. The applicants claim to be mortgagee of said plot having mortgage deed/agreement executed prior to the date when said plot was attached by the Authority to realise the decretal amount. If all this is true, the applicants have prior interest in said plot. Considering all these facts, I do not find any reason to recall order attaching said property in realization of decretal amount. However, it is made clear here that the applicants are having prior interest by way of mortgage, the same can realise their amount before the yield of same is used to satisfy the decree under execution. With this observation, application is thus dismissed. To come on 11.02.2022 for further proceedings.	RAJINDER KUMAR	View Order	15-Dec-2021
16-Nov-2021	PENDING	Arguments heard on an application. At the same time, counsel for JD-2 submits that she would like to file written submissions. Allowed. Be filed at least two days before next date. To come on 14.12.2021 for order.	RAJINDER KUMAR	View Order	18-Nov-2021
03-Nov-2021	PENDING	Learned counsel for Decree holder requests for adjournment stating that main counsel is suffering with fewer. Not opposed. At the same time, learned counsel for respondent No.1 is also requested for short adjournment stating that she wants to file reply to application, filed on behalf of applicant/mortgagee. Be filed till next date. To come ton 16.11.2021 for further proceedings.	RAJINDER KUMAR	View Order	08-Nov-2021
27-Sep-2021	PENDING	Some documents are filed by the DH. Counsel for DH undertakes to supply copies of those documents to the counsel for JD/respondent. At the same time, it is pointed out that an application on behalf of JD/respondent has been filed. Copy of same is stated to have received by counsel for DH. Learned counsel for DH seeks time to file reply as well as to advance arguments. Allowed. 2. To come on 03.11.2021 for arguments.	RAJINDER KUMAR	View Order	05-Oct-2021
15-Sep-2021	PENDING	AR of JD/respondent (Orris Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd) requests for some time to show orders of NCLT. Allowed. 2. To come on 27.09.2021for further proceedings.	RAJINDER KUMAR	View Order	20-Sep-2021
25-Aug-2021	PENDING	On joint request, matter is adjourned to 15.09.2021 for further proceedings.	RAJINDER KUMAR	View Order	04-Sep-2021
17-May-2021	PENDING	Due to increase in the Covid-19 cases in and around the area of the Authority and lockdown in the State, the case is not being taken up for hearing. Hence, as per directions of the Hon’ble Authority, it is being adjourned to 25.08.2021 for the proceedings already fixed. 2. Both the parties be informed accordingly through e-mail.	SUBHASH CHAND GOYAL	View Order	18-May-2021
31-Mar-2021	PENDING	Memo of appearance on behalf of respondent No. 2 alongwith copies of orders passed by NCLT has been placed on file. Let the matter be put up on 17.5.2021 for further proceedings.	SUBHASH CHAND GOYAL	View Order	01-Apr-2021
01-Mar-2021	PENDING	The file has not been put. Let the same be put up on 31.03.2021.	SUBHASH CHAND GOYAL	---	---
15-Feb-2021	PENDING	None is present either of the parties. Even the file has not been put up by the Registry. 2. Let the matter be put up on 01.03.2021 for further proceedings.	SUBHASH CHAND GOYAL	---	---
08-Feb-2021	PENDING	File has not been put up by the Registry. Let it be put up on 15.02.2021.	SUBHASH CHAND GOYAL	---	---
19-Jan-2021	PENDING	File is not traceable. Let, the same be put up on 08.02.2021.	SUBHASH CHAND GOYAL	---	---
20-Oct-2020	PENDING	THE CASE IS ADJOURNED TO 19.01.2021	SUBHASH CHAND GOYAL	---	---
01-Oct-2020	PENDING	File has not been received from the office. Let the same be requisitioned for further proceedings and the matter be put up on 20.10.2020 for further proceedings.	SUBHASH CHAND GOYAL	---	---
10-Aug-2020	PENDING	DUE TO COVID-19 PANDEMIC, THE MATTER IS ADJOURNED TO 01.10.2020	SUBHASH CHAND GOYAL	---	---
15-May-2020	PENDING	DUE TO LOCKDOWN, THE MATTER IS ADJOURNED TO 10.08.2020	SUBHASH CHAND GOYAL	---	---
25-Mar-2020	PENDING	DU ETO LOCKDOWN, THE MATTER IS ADJOURNED TO 15.05.2020	SUBHASH CHAND GOYAL	---	---
18-Feb-2020	PENDING	THE CASE IS ADJOURNED TO 25.03.2020	SUBHASH CHAND GOYAL	---	---
13-Feb-2020	PENDING	HEARING DATE 18.02.2020	K K KHANDELWAL SAMIR KUMAR SUBHASH CHANDER KUSH	View Order	19-Mar-2020
16-Jan-2020	PENDING	HEARING DATE 13.02.2020	K K KHANDELWAL SAMIR KUMAR SUBHASH CHANDER KUSH	View Order	20-Mar-2020
14-Jan-2020	PENDING	HEARING DATE 16.01.2020	K K KHANDELWAL SAMIR KUMAR SUBHASH CHANDER KUSH	View Order	19-Mar-2020
06-Jan-2020	PENDING	HEARING DATE 14.01.2020	K K KHANDELWAL SAMIR KUMAR SUBHASH CHANDER KUSH	View Order	19-Mar-2020
23-Dec-2019	PENDING	Hearing Date 06.01.2020	K K KHANDELWAL SAMIR KUMAR SUBHASH CHANDER KUSH	View Order	19-Mar-2020
18-Dec-2019	PENDING	HEARING DATE 23.12.2019	K K KHANDELWAL SAMIR KUMAR SUBHASH CHANDER KUSH	View Order	19-Mar-2020
10-Dec-2019	PENDING	HEARING DATE 18.12.2019	K K KHANDELWAL SAMIR KUMAR SUBHASH CHANDER KUSH	View Order	19-Mar-2020
08-Nov-2019	PENDING	Hearing Date 10.12.2019	K K KHANDELWAL SAMIR KUMAR SUBHASH CHANDER KUSH	View Order	19-Mar-2020
03-Oct-2019	FIRST HEARING	Hearing Date 12.09.2019	K K KHANDELWAL SAMIR KUMAR SUBHASH CHANDER KUSH	View Order	20-Mar-2020
12-Sep-2019	PENDING	Hearing Date 08.11.2019	K K KHANDELWAL SAMIR KUMAR SUBHASH CHANDER KUSH	View Order	19-Mar-2020