Comprehensive Project Details
Project Location Details
Project Name Project Location Project District Project Tehsil Promoter Name
It colony ( commerce park) Sector- 61, ghata, gurugram GURUGRAM Emaar mgf land ltd
Project Detail
Project Id Receiving Date Online Submission Date Current Status Next Date of Hearing Notice Dispatched Notice Dispatched On Notice Tracking Id Notice Dispatched Remarks View Notice Initially Scrutinized Remarks
RERA-GRG-1949-2025 05-May-2025 05-May-2025 CONTINUING APPROVED NOT REQUIRED Not Yet -- First hearing
Project Listing Details
Date of Hearing Proceedings of the day Status Order
30-Jun-2025 Sh. Ashish Kush, Planning Executive and Ms. Asha, Chartered Accountant briefed about the facts of the case. Sh. Purushottam Grover (AR), Sh. Anitesh Singh and Sh. Venkat Rao (Advocate) are present on behalf of the promoter. 1.      The promoter submitted an application for registration of the project under Section 4 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") with interim RERA, Panchkula, wherein the promoter declared the timeline for completion of the project as 31.03.2021, in accordance with the requirement under Section 4(2)(l)(C) of the Act. 2.      In view of the disruption caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, this Authority, through its directions, granted an automatic extension of six months in respect of registered projects where the validity of the registration certificate was due to expire on or after 25.03.2020. Consequently, the validity of the registration certificate in the present case stood extended up to 30.09.2021. 3.      As per Section 6 of the Act read with Rule 7 of the Haryana Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Rules, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as "the Rules, 2017"), the promoter was required to apply for extension of registration at least three months prior to the expiry of the registration certificate, in case the promoter fails to complete the project within declared time period under Section 4(2)(l)(C) of the Act. However, the promoter failed to apply for such extension within the stipulated timeline. 4.      Instead of applying for an extension, the promoter submitted an application on 12.07.2021 seeking de-registration/surrender of the project, citing poor market response due to change in policies and market scenario, and the fact that most of the units remained unsold. It was further stated that the promoter intended to avail the benefits of the Transit Oriented Development (TOD) policy, for which approval was still pending. 5.      Subsequently, two more applications were filed by the promoter on 07.10.2022 and 04.03.2024 for de-registration/surrender of the project. The Authority issued a communication dated 17.05.2024 pointing out certain deficiencies. It is pertinent to note that the Act, 2016 does not contain any provision for de-registration of projects after grant of registration. 6.      Thereafter, the promoter obtained revised building plans with increased Floor Area Ratio (FAR) under the TOD and Transferable Development Rights (TDR) policies, vide Memo No. ZP-400-III/PA(DK)/2025/11992 dated 02.04.2025. 7.      On the basis of the revised plans, the promoter applied for continuation of registration under Section 7(3) of the Act, 2016. However, since the promoter had failed to apply for extension/continuation of registration within the prescribed timeline, a late fee was imposed in accordance with the applicable regulations. The AR of the promoter states that the deficit fee (including late fee) of Rs 9,33,83,202/- has been submitted on 23.06.2025 and the deficit documents were also submitted on 27.06.2025. 8.      In compliance with the due process, a public notice was published in three newspapers, namely, The Times of India (English), The Tribune (English), and Nav Bharat Times (Hindi), dated 23.05.2025, inviting objections from the public till 05.06.2025 regarding the application of the promoter for registration to remain in force under section 7(3) of the Act, 2016. No objections have been received till date. 9.      The promoter submitted a list of 221 allottees, of whom 220 allottees have either been settled/shifted/refunded, and only one allottee remained, in respect of whom an alternate unit was directed to be allotted as per the Authority’s order dated 25.03.2025. 10.  A second public notice was thereafter issued on 12.06.2025 in the same newspapers, inviting objections from erstwhile allottees till 20.06.2025. No objections have been received in response to this notice either. 11.  The promoter was under obligation to complete the project by 30.09.2021 including the COVID-19 extension period as delineated hereinabove. However, despite obtaining building plan approval as early as 29.09.2008, the promoter failed to commence any construction activity on the project site till date. Furthermore, the promoter did not complete the project within the declared timeline, including the COVID-19 extension period, thereby violating Section 4(2)(l)(C) of the Act. Consequently, a Show Cause Notice bearing No. RC/HARERA/GGM/EPIN/7(3)/133 (Show Cause) dated 15.05.2025 was issued to the promoter for violation of the said provision. Moreover, the promoter, during the course of the project, created third-party rights by allotting units to 221 allottees, thereby affecting interests of allottees and invoking the protective intent of the Act. Although all these allottees have been settled/shifted/refunded, except one for whom an alternate unit was directed to be provided as per the Authority’s order dated 25.03.2025. The fact remains that third-party rights were created in the absence of actual development on site. Such conduct reflects a serious breach of the promoter’s statutory duties and regulatory commitments. Given the inaction and failure to adhere to the project timeline, despite regulatory approvals being in place, the promoter is squarely liable for penal action under Section 60 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016, for contravening the terms and conditions of the registration, particularly by declaring project timelines without any intent or action towards timely execution. Therefore, the Authority imposes a penalty of Rs. 25,00,000/- for non-compliance with the timeline stipulated under Section 4(2)(l)(C) of the Act for which a separate detailed order shall follow. 12.   In light of the foregoing facts, it is pertinent to note that the licensed area in question has already been registered by the interim RERA, Panchkula, and despite the lapse of several years, no construction activity has been initiated at the project site. While the promoter has now obtained revised building plan approvals on 02.04.2025 under the TOD and TDR policies, the underlying land is same as previously registered. The Authority observes that the Act does not contain any provision for de-registration of a project once registration has been granted, nor does it permit re-registration of the same land as a new project. Therefore, keeping in view the facts that (i) construction has not yet commenced, (ii) all allottees have been settled except one, and (iii) revised plans have been approved, the only lawful and viable course available to the Authority is to consider the promoter’s present application under Section 7(3) of the Act, 2016, which permits continuation of the registration, subject to satisfaction of all stipulated conditions, ensuring regulatory compliance and safeguarding the public interest. 13.  In view of the above, it is established that the promoter failed to complete the project within the declared timeline in violation of Section 4(2)(l)(C) of the Act, and did not apply for extension of registration within the statutory period. Instead, the promoter sought de-registration/surrender of the project; however, it is reiterated and emphasised that there is no provision for de-registration of a real estate project under the Act of 2016. Considering that no allottees remain in the project, the building plans have been revised and approved, and no objections have been received pursuant to the public notices, the Authority is inclined to allow continuation of registration under Section 7(3) of the Act. This is, however, strictly subject to the following conditions: ·       The promoter shall deposit a penalty of Rs. 25,00,000/- for non-compliance with the timeline stipulated under Section 4(2)(l)(C) of the Act. ·       The promoter shall submit the following approval within a period of 4 months from the date of issuance of the continued registration certificate: o    Fire Scheme Approval, o    Approved Service Plans and Estimates, and ·       Tree Cutting Permission shall also be submitted prior to any cutting of the trees. ·       The continuation of registration is granted without prejudice to the rights of existing or erstwhile allottees under Section 18 of the Act. ·       Further, conditions as prescribed in the continuation registration certificate. 16.  The Authorized Representative (AR) of the promoter is also directed to declare details of ongoing litigation in relation to real estate projects developed or being developed in the State in the preceding five years, as required under Rule 14(1)(a)(iii) of the Rules, 2017, in the format prescribed under Annexure-C of the Rules, 2017. 17.  The certificate shall be issued after rectification of all deficiencies, including Corrections in the Online DPI, and Submission of the penalty amount of Rs. 25 lakhs for violation of Section 4(2)(l)(C) of the Act. CONTINUING APPROVED View Order
23-Jun-2025 Sh. Ashish Kush, Planning Executive and Ms. Asha, Chartered Accountant briefed about the facts of the case. Ms. Priyanka Miglani (AR), Sh. Purushottam Grover (AR), Sh. Anitesh Singh and Sh. Venkat Rao (Advocate) are present on behalf of the promoter. Sh. Pradeep Aggarwal (Advocate), Sh. Arjun Aggarwal (Advocate), Sh. Prince Singh (Advocate) and Sh. Inderjeet Singh (AR) are present on behalf of M/s Assotech Realty Pvt. Ltd. The advocate on behalf of M/s Assotech Realty Pvt. Ltd. stated that the title of the land is not clear with the promoter as litigations is pending with both in Civil Court at Gurugram as well as before the Hon’ble Supreme Court. The AR of the promoter stated that the complainant company has already exhausted all legal remedies before the Hon'ble Civil Courts, including the Hon'ble Trial Court and up to the Hon'ble Apex Court, and has been unequivocally denied any relief at every stage. Hence, at present, there is no stay or injunctive relief of any kind granted in favor of the complainant by any judicial forum. On the contrary, while applying for and obtaining the certificate, the answering company had fully and transparently disclosed the details of the ongoing cases including those now referred to in the present complaint, the list of litigations submitted along with the application. An application for registration of the project was filed by M/s Emaar India Limited (Formerly known as Emaar MGF Land Pvt. Ltd.) under section 4 of the Act, 2016 for registration of the IT Park Colony project comprising an area of 5.65 acres falling in license No. 34 of 2008 dated 23.02.2008 issued by the Director General, Town and Country Planning Department, Haryana. And whereas after scrutiny and compliance of the requisite approvals, the Authority approved grant of Registration Certificate to the said Promoter vide Registration No. 58 of 2017 dated 17.08.2017. In the said application submitted by the Promoter under section 4 of the Act, 2016, the promoter had declared the timelines for completion of the project as required under section 4(2)(l)(C) of the Act, 2016 as 31.03.2021 + 6 months covid = (30.09.2021). However, the promoter failed to complete the project by the committed timeline declared under section 4(2)(l)(C) of the Act, 2016. Further, the promoter applied for de-registration/surrender of the project on 12.07.2021 stating that the project was launched but due to change in policy and market scenario, there was lukewarm response from the customer and most of the units remain unsold. Later on the Government issued TOD policy and the promoter was interested in availing the same but the approval remain pending. Thereafter, two more applications dated 07.10.2022 and 04.03.2024 were submitted in this regard wherein the Authority conveyed some observations vide letter dated 17.05.205 but the matter remain pending. As neither the promoter has complied fully against the observations nor there is any provision of de-registration in the Act of 2016. Now, the promoter obtained the revised building plans with increased FAR under TOD and TDR policy and applied for continuation of registration of project u/s 7(3) of the Act of 2016. Further, The AR of the promoter stated the deficit documents alongwith the deficit fee is being submitted today. The matter to come up on 30.06.2025. ADJOURNMENT View Order
09-Jun-2025 ADJOURNMENT View Order
19-May-2025 Sh. Ashish Kush, Planning Executive and Ms. Asha, Chartered Accountant briefed about the facts of the case.Sh. Purushottam Grover (AR), Ms. Priyanka Miglani (AR), Sh. Venkat Rao (Advocate) and Sh. Anitesh Singh (AR) are present on behalf of the promoter. The AR of the promoter stated that the reply to the deficiencies has been submitted on 16.05.2025. The building plans has been revised after utilization of TOD and TDR.The office to examine the reply. Further, a complaint has been filed in the Authority, copy of which be supplied to the promoter for reply. A public notice of two weeks for inviting objections from the allottees be issued in at least three prominent newspapers (Two English and One Hindi) of wide circulation as being given in case of continuation of registration under section 7(3) of the Act of 2016 alongwith the details of revision of building plans.The matter to come up on 09.06.2025. EXAMINATION BY AUTHORITY View Order