31-Mar-2022 |
Proceedings dated 31.03.2022
Ar. Neeraj Gautam,
Associate Architectural Executive briefed the facts about the case.
Sh. Anurag Srivastava
(GM) and Sh. Ajay Kumar (AGM) are present on the behalf of the promoter.
The requisite corrections in online DPI and REP-I
(Part A-H) have been made. The AR of the
promoter submitted that approval of service plans and estimates has been only
recommended by CE-I of HSVP to DTCP, Haryana and final approval is expected
shortly. The escrow agreement executed with the bank is yet to be submitted.
The authority decides to grant the registration
subject to the submission of bank guarantee/security cheque of Rs. 25 lakhs on
account of approved service plans and estimates within seven days from the date
of grant of registration.
This bank guarantee/ security cheque shall be
forfeited in case of failure to submit the approved service plans and estimates
in the authority within three months from the date of grant of registration. |
APPROVED AND READY FOR CERTIFICATE ISSUING PROCESS |
--- |
28-Mar-2022 |
The matter is adjourned to 31.03.2022 |
ADJOURNMENT |
--- |
21-Mar-2022 |
The matter is adjourned to 28.03.2022 |
OBJECTION |
--- |
14-Mar-2022 |
Proceedings dated 14.03.2022
Ar. Neeraj Gautam,
Associate Architectural Executive briefed the facts about the case.
Sh. Anurag Srivastava (GM)
and Sh. Ajay Kumar (AGM) are present on the behalf of the promoter. The AR
of the promoter informs that the requisite corrections in form A to H and
online DPI have been made and a hard copy of the same is also being submitted
today for scrutiny of the concerned Planning Executive. Further, regarding
submission of the copy of the loan sanction letter, the AR clarified that there is
no bank loan rather the fund to the tune of Rs. 56 crores has been raised
through the issuance of non-convertible debenture series and a copy of the form filed
with MCA site has been submitted and be checked/verified by CA of the
Authority. The CA has raised the issue that as per the title search report, the loan
of Rs. 250 crores against the applicant promoter is being shown while as per
DPI, the loan is being shown only Rs. 56 crores. The AR clarifies that the loan of Rs. 250
crores is against the promoter company but has been availed for multiple
projects of the company, and the amount of loan of Rs. 56 crores shown in DPI has
been taken in proportion to the land that has been secured by way of loan
amount for this project. A clarification to this extent be given in DPI. The AR
further clarifies that the approval of the service plan and estimates stand
submitted to DTCP and have been technically okayed by CE of HSVP and are likely
to be approved by DTCP shortly. The promoter is yet to submit a copy of the Escrow
agreement executed with the bank.
The matter to come up on 21.03.2022. |
EXAMINATION BY AUTHORITY |
--- |