Comprehensive Complaint Details
Complaint Detail:RERA-GRG-1249-2025
Party Dtls Self / Adv Name District Current Status Next Date of Hearing Complaint Dispatched Complaint Dispatched On Dispatched Tracking Id Complaint Dispatched Remarks First-Hearing/Scrutinized Remarks View Notice
HARERA THROUGH NEERAJ V/S
GODREJ VESTAMARK LLP
Self GURUGRAM DISPOSED NOT REQUIRED Yes 05-Mar-2025 RERA-GRG-1249-2025 DISPATCHED TO AR NON COMPLIANCE OF RC CONDITIONS
Notice Details
Notice Number Remarks Dispatching Date Dispatch Id View Notice
First Notice DISPATCHED TO AR 05-Mar-2025 RERA-GRG-1249-2025
Complaint Listing Details
Date of Hearing Status Proceedings of the day Bench Order Order Uploaded On
07-Aug-2025 DISPOSED Ar. Neeraj Gautam (Associate Architectural Executive) briefed the facts of the case. Ms. Anjana Gulati and Ms. Anupam Kohli (AR) is present on behalf of the promoter and states that they have submitted a reply dated 19.03.2025 stating that they submitted a request dated 04.11.2024 to the Authority seeking more time to submit the approval of service plans and estimates. The AR states that despite consistent follow ups and requests the delay of 18 days was caused. The delay happened because of the departmental procedures and not on the behalf of the promoter. The AR request to condone the delay and refund the security amount. The Authority decided in its meeting dated 01.01.2024 that the compliances by the promoters must be made without fail within the timeline of conditional registration failing which the BG/ security be forfeited and further action be initiated as per the provisions of the Act of 2016. It is not disputed that the promoter was granted conditional registration at its own accord and depositing of security amount of Rs. 25 lakhs each as a security deposit to submit the environmental clearance, approved service plans and estimates and approved fire scheme within four months of the grant of registration certificate. It was clearly mentioned in the registration certificate at para G(iii) that “this DDs shall be forfeited in favour of authority in case the conditions are not fulfilled by the promoter within the stipulated time period.” Since the approval of service plans & estimates is obtained with a delay of 18 days, the security amount deposited on account of the same is hereby forfeited. The security amounts deposited on account of environmental clearance and fire scheme approval already stand refunded. Since the compliance is now made, the case is filed. Detailed order shall follow. ASHOK SANGWAN View Order 21-Aug-2025
20-Mar-2025 FIRST HEARING Matter is adjourned to 07.08.2025. ASHOK SANGWAN --- ---
Complaint Final Judgement Details
Date of Judgement Party Details Judgement Uploading Date View Judgement
07-Aug-2025 HARERA THROUGH NEERAJ V/S
GODREJ VESTAMARK LLP
--- ---
Documents Submitted
Dak ID Receiving Date Submitted By Remarks
87883 05/03/2025 HARERA THROGH NEERAJ NEW COMPLAINT
88451 19/03/2025 ANUPAM REPLY TO SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE FOR FORFEIT OF SECURITY AMOUNT NOTICE NO. 1249-2025 DATED 05/03/2025