| 07-Aug-2025 |
DISPOSED |
Ar. Neeraj Gautam (Associate
Architectural Executive) briefed the facts of the case.
Ms. Anjana Gulati
and Ms. Anupam Kohli (AR) is present on behalf of the promoter and states that
they have submitted a reply dated 19.03.2025 stating that they submitted a
request dated 04.11.2024 to the Authority seeking more time to submit the
approval of service plans and estimates. The AR states that despite consistent
follow ups and requests the delay of 18 days was caused. The delay happened
because of the departmental procedures and not on the behalf of the promoter.
The AR request to condone the delay and refund the security amount.
The Authority decided in its
meeting dated 01.01.2024 that the compliances by the promoters must be made
without fail within the timeline of conditional registration failing which the
BG/ security be forfeited and further action be initiated as per the provisions
of the Act of 2016.
It is not disputed that the
promoter was granted conditional registration at its own accord and depositing
of security amount of Rs. 25 lakhs each as a security deposit to submit the
environmental clearance, approved service plans and estimates and approved fire
scheme within four months of the grant of registration certificate. It was
clearly mentioned in the registration certificate at para G(iii) that “this
DDs shall be forfeited in favour of authority in case the conditions are not
fulfilled by the promoter within the stipulated time period.”
Since the
approval of service plans & estimates is obtained with a delay of 18 days,
the security amount deposited on account of the same is hereby forfeited.
The security
amounts deposited on account of environmental clearance and fire scheme
approval already stand refunded.
Since the
compliance is now made, the case is filed.
Detailed order shall follow. |
ASHOK SANGWAN |
View Order |
21-Aug-2025 |