26-Mar-2025 |
SINE DIE |
Matter is adjourned sine die. |
RAJINDER KUMAR |
View Order |
01-Apr-2025 |
29-Oct-2024 |
PENDING |
Matter is adjourned to 26.03.2025. |
RAJINDER KUMAR |
View Order |
06-Nov-2024 |
29-Jul-2024 |
PENDING |
Matter is adjourned to 29.10.2024. |
RAJINDER KUMAR |
View Order |
02-Aug-2024 |
08-Jan-2024 |
RE-OPEN/PENDING |
RE-OPENED |
RAJINDER KUMAR |
View Order |
10-Jan-2024 |
04-Dec-2023 |
PENDING |
Matter is adjourned to 08.01.2024. |
RAJINDER KUMAR |
View Order |
27-Dec-2023 |
09-Oct-2023 |
PENDING |
Matter is adjourned to 04.12.2023. |
RAJINDER KUMAR |
View Order |
13-Oct-2023 |
25-Sep-2023 |
PENDING |
Matter is adjourned to 09.10.2023. |
RAJINDER KUMAR |
View Order |
10-Oct-2023 |
27-Jul-2023 |
PENDING |
Matter is adjourned to 25.09.2023. |
RAJINDER KUMAR |
View Order |
17-Aug-2023 |
05-May-2023 |
PENDING |
None for DH/complainant. Issue notice to DH/complainant for next
date.
To come on 27.07.2023 for further proceedings. |
RAJINDER KUMAR |
View Order |
11-May-2023 |
28-Mar-2023 |
PENDING |
As per learned
counsel for JD, his client has already made full and final payment to the DH.
None is appearing on behalf of DH. Issue notice to the DH/complainant for next
date.
To come on 05.05.2023
for further proceedings. |
RAJINDER KUMAR |
View Order |
05-Apr-2023 |
13-Dec-2022 |
PENDING |
Four cheques total amounting Rs. 4,79,625/-
stated to be entire amount against his client are handed over by learned
counsel for JD to counsel for DH. The latter accepts the same as part payment. According
to him, certain more amounts remain due against JD.
To come on 28.03.2023
for further proceedings. |
RAJINDER KUMAR |
View Order |
22-Dec-2022 |
18-Oct-2022 |
PENDING |
Directors of JD were asked to appear
in person before this forum for their
oral examination about assets/properties of JD. None is present despite service upon Shri
Mohit Arora and Komal Saxena. Learned counsel for DH requests to send directors
of JD to civil imprisonment for not complying with order of this forum. Issue show cause notice to directors of JD as why they be not committed
to civil imprisonment for not complying with order of this forum. Reply, if
any, be filed till next date.
To come on 13.12.2022 for further proceedings. |
RAJINDER KUMAR |
View Order |
24-Feb-2023 |
25-Aug-2022 |
PENDING |
Heard
on an objection filed by the respondent/JD against decree under execution. It
is submitted by learned counsel for Objector/JD that order under execution was
passed by Adjudicating Officer, who had no jurisdiction to decide matters of
refund. It was Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Gurugram,
which was empowered to decide cases of refund. A decree passed without jurisdiction is nullity and this issue can be raised at any stage, even during execution.
Learned counsel for Objector/JD
explained that Haryana Real Estate
Appellate Tribunal, Chandigarh( in brief Appellate Tribunal) while deciding a
case titled as Sameer Mahawar Vs MG Housing Pvt
Ltd. concluded that the learned
Authority had no jurisdiction to adjudicate upon the issue regarding refund.
Same directed that the
complaints filed by the allottees seeking refund should be transferred to the
Court of Adjudicating Officer. All such cases were thus transferred to the
Adjudicating Officer, for disposal but
the State of Haryana notified
Haryana Real Estate(Regulation and Development) Amendment Rules, 2019 on
12.09.2019. Through Rules 28 & 29, the learned Authority was given the jurisdiction to entertain and
adjudicate complaints seeking relief of
refund. Validity of these rules was confirmed by the High Court of Punjab
and Haryana at Chandigarh in case titled
as Experion Developers Pvt Ltd. Vs State of Haryana & Ors. In
this way, as per learned counsel only the Authority was empowered to try
and entertain cases for refund and not
the Adjudicating Officer.
As per learned counsel for
decree holder, this forum was fully competent to decide the cases of refund
after findings giving by the Appellate Tribunal in case referred above. Order passed by our own High Court in
Experion Developer‘s case(supra) was
stayed by the Apex Court and directions were given by Appellate Tribunal in
Sameer Mahawar case were still binding.
There is no quarrel
on the issue that plea of nullity of an order can be taken at any stage, even during execution proceedings.
It is not denied that order
passed by our own High Court was stayed by Apex Court, though matter has been finally decided now. As discussed earlier, before findings given
by Hon’ble High Court in Experion Developer’s case(supra), cases of refund were used to be dealt by Adjudicating
Officer and order of High Court was
stayed by the Apex court. During this
period of stay, till matter is decided by Apex court i.e. Newtech Promoters
& Developers Pvt Ltd. Vs State of U P Etc in Civil Appeals No.6745-6749 f 2021, all such
cases of refund were decided by Adjudicating Officer. Order under execution
was also passed during this period.
In this way, I find weight in the plea of learned counsel for decree
holder stating that this forum i.e. Adjudicating Officer was
fully competent to try and entertain the case, in which order under execution
was passed.
I find no merit in objections raised by
counsel for JD, about jurisdiction of this forum.
Objections are thus dismissed.
Let directors of JD be called
in person before this forum for their oral examination about assets/properties
of JD including details of bank accounts worth attachment.
To come on 18.10.2022 for
further proceedings. |
RAJINDER KUMAR |
View Order |
24-Feb-2023 |
07-Jul-2022 |
FIRST HEARING |
Adjudicating
Officer is on leave. Adjourned to
25.08.2022. |
RAJINDER KUMAR |
View Order |
24-Feb-2023 |