19-Mar-2024 |
DISPOSED |
The
counsel for the complainant - builder
stated that the matter has been settled between the parties and placed on
record a copy of settlement deed dated 31.12.2023 which is duly signed by both
the parties.
The matter is disposed off in terms of settlement deed dated
31.12.2023. File be consigned to the registry. |
ASHOK SANGWAN VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA |
View Order |
01-Apr-2024 |
16-Jan-2024 |
PENDING |
The
counsel for the complainant-builder states that the matter has been settled
amicably between the parties and placed
on record a copy of settlement deed dated 31.12.2023.
Proxy
counsel for the respondent-allottee states that although the settlement deed
has ben signed between the parties, the same is yet to be complied by way of
handing over of possession and seeks a short date for confirmation of the same.
Matter
to come up on 19.3.2024 for further proceedings. |
ASHOK SANGWAN |
View Order |
24-Jan-2024 |
10-Oct-2023 |
PENDING |
Both the
counsels for the parties request stated at bar that settlement talks are going
on between the parties. Request is allowed.
Matter
to come up on 16.01.2024 for further proceedings. |
VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL ASHOK SANGWAN SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA |
View Order |
18-Oct-2023 |
01-Aug-2023 |
PENDING |
The present complaint was filed in ‘Form CRA’
on 27.11.2019 and the reply has been
filed by the respondent on 21.09.2020.
The present
complaint was filed by complainant/promoter and the same was disposed of on
12.02.2021 and it was observed as under:
“Reply has already been filed by the respondent.
Since the matter is pending before the NCLT, the complainant is advised
to pursue the matter before the said forum.
In view of the pendency of the matter before the NCLT, the present
complaint stands disposed. File be consigned to the Registry.”
Thereafter, the
complainant/promoter has approached the Hon’ble HREAT by filing an appeal
bearing no. 110 of 2021 and the said appeal was disposed of on 19.01.2023 with
following observations:
“9. Admittedly, vide impugned order dated 12.02.2021 the complaint preferred
by the appellant/promoter had been dismissed by the learned Authority simply on
account of the fact that the matter was pending before the Hon’ble NCLT and the
appellant was advised to pursue the matter before the said forum. Since, that
petition filed by the respondents/allottees before the Hon’ble NCLT has been
got dismissed as withdrawn, so, in these circumstances, the matter is remitted
to the learned Authority for adjudication of the present lis between the
parties on merits.
10. Consequently, the present appeal is hereby allowed. The impugned
order dated 12.02.2021 handed down by the learned Authority is set aside. The
complaint is remitted to the learned Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority,
Gurugram, for fresh trial/decision in accordance with law. The learned
Authority is directed to dispose of the complaint preferred by the
appellant/promoter expeditiously.”
Thus, the present
complaint is before the authority.
Succinct facts of
the case as per complaint and reply are as under:
Sr.
No.
Particulars
Details
1.
Name of the project
Marbella, Sector 65 & 66, Gurugram, Haryana
2.
Total area of the project
107.9 acres
3.
Nature of the project
Residential plotted colony
4.
DTCP license no.
97 of 2010 dated 18.11.2010
41 of 2011 dated 03.05.2011
Validity of license
18.11.2022
03.05.2024
Licensee
Foyer Propbuild Pvt. Ltd. and ors.
Foyer Propbuild Pvt. Ltd. and anr.
Area for which license was granted
106.86 acres
1.063 acres
5.
Registered/not registered
Registered
in two phases
i.
307 of 2017 dated
17.10.2017 for 41.86 acres
[Valid
up to 16.10.2022]
ii.
8 of 2021 dated
01.03.2021 (Phase II) for 66.059 acres
[For 12.609 acres- Valid
up w.e.f. 01.03.2021 till 31.12.2023
For 53.45 acres- Valid
up w.e.f. 01.03.2021 till 31.12.2027]
6.
Occupation certificate granted on
03.06.2019
[Page 118 of complaint]
7.
Provisional allotment letter
18.02.2014
[Page 31 of complaint]
8.
Villa/Unit no.
MAR-BE-053
[Page 68 of complaint]
9.
Area of the villa/unit
2872.92 sq. ft. (super built-up area) on 267 sq.
yd. plot
[Page 35 of complaint]
10.
Date of execution of buyer’s agreement
05.03.2014
[Page 33 of complaint]
11.
Possession clause
10. POSSESSION
(a) Time of handing over the Possession
Subject to terms of
this clause and subject to the Allottee(s) having complied with all the terms
and conditions of this Agreement, and not being in default under any of the
provisions of this Buyer’s Agreement and compliance with all provisions,
formalities, documentation etc. as prescribed by the Company, the Company
proposes to hand over the possession of the Villa within 30 (thirty)
months from Start of Villa Construction. The Allottee(s) agrees and
understands that the Company shall be entitled to a grace period of 3 (three) months, for applying and obtaining
the occupation certificate in respect of the Villa. (Emphasis supplied)
[page 45 of complaint]
12.
Date of of start of construction
as per statement of account dated 07.06.2019 at page 125 of complaint
31.10.2014
13.
Due date of possession
31.07.2017
14.
Consideration as per payment plan annexed with the buyer’s agreement at
page 68 of complaint
Rs.6,66,20,216/-
15.
Total consideration as per
statement of account dated 07.06.2019 at page 125 of complaint and 14.08.2019
at page 76 of reply
Rs. 6,71,90,112/-
16.
Total amount paid by the respondents as per statement
of account dated 07.06.2019 at page 126 of complaint and dated 14.08.2019 at
page 77 of reply
Rs. 4,95,86,083/-
17.
Offer of possession
07.06.2019
[Page
119 of complaint]
18.
Email by the respondents-allottees intimating withdrawal from the
project
02.09.2019
[Page
89 of reply]
Arguments heard.
The counsel for the complainant-promoter states that
offer of possession already stands made to the respondent allottee in June 2019
after obtaining OC from the competent authority and has filed the above
complaint before the authority for issuing directions to the respondent
allottee to clear outstanding amount and to take possession. Further, earlier
the respondent allottee has filed a case for refund before NCLT which was
later-on withdrawn and the Hon’ble Appellate Tribunal has remanded back the
case for passing a reasoned order after hearing both the parties.
The counsel for the respondent allottee states that there was delay in offering possession which
as per BBA was to be handed over in July
2017 and after delayed offer, the
termination notice to the promoter was sent on 02.09.2019 and on failure has
moved before the NCLT. The case before Hon’ble
NCLT has been withdrawn and now the matter for refund is pending before the
Hon’ble NCDRC on the complaint of the
respondent allottee and is fixed for hearing on 24.08.2023.
Both the counsel for the parties are directed to file
written submissions within a period of 2
weeks after supplying a copy to each other.
Matter to come up
on 10.10.2023 for final arguments. |
VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL ASHOK SANGWAN SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA |
View Order |
12-Aug-2023 |
09-May-2023 |
PENDING |
The present complaint was filed in ‘Form CRA’
on 27.11.2019 and the reply has been
filed by the respondent on 21.09.2020.
The present
complaint was filed by complainant/promoter and the same was disposed of on
12.02.2021 and it was observed as under:
“Reply has already been filed by the respondent.
Since the matter is pending before the NCLT, the complainant is advised
to pursue the matter before the said forum.
In view of the pendency of the matter before the NCLT, the present
complaint stands disposed. File be consigned to the Registry.”
Thereafter, the
complainant/promoter has approached the Hon’ble HREAT by filing an appeal
bearing no. 110 of 2021 and the said appeal was disposed of on 19.01.2023 with
following observations:
“9. Admittedly, vide impugned order dated 12.02.2021 the complaint preferred
by the appellant/promoter had been dismissed by the learned Authority simply on
account of the fact that the matter was pending before the Hon’ble NCLT and the
appellant was advised to pursue the matter before the said forum. Since, that
petition filed by the respondents/allottees before the Hon’ble NCLT has been
got dismissed as withdrawn, so, in these circumstances, the matter is remitted
to the learned Authority for adjudication of the present lis between the
parties on merits.
10. Consequently, the present appeal is hereby allowed. The impugned
order dated 12.02.2021 handed down by the learned Authority is set aside. The
complaint is remitted to the learned Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority,
Gurugram, for fresh trial/decision in accordance with law. The learned
Authority is directed to dispose of the complaint preferred by the
appellant/promoter expeditiously.”
The respondent has
filed the reply on 21.09.2020 but the copy is not received by the
complainant-promoter and a copy of the reply may be obtained from the registry
of the authority as none is present on behalf of the respondent-allottee. One
more opportunity to the respondent allottee is given to put in appearance.
Matter to come up
on 01.08.2023 for further proceedings. |
VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL ASHOK SANGWAN SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA |
View Order |
17-May-2023 |
12-Feb-2021 |
SINE DIE |
Reply has already been filed by the
respondent. Since the matter is pending before
the NCLT, the complainant is
advised to pursue the matter
before the said forum.
In view of the pendency of
the matter before the NCLT, the present
complaint stands disposed. File be
consigned to the Registry. |
K K KHANDELWAL SAMIR KUMAR SUBHASH CHANDER KUSH |
View Order |
19-Feb-2021 |
17-Dec-2020 |
PENDING |
Counsel
for the complainant has stated that he has not received the copy of the reply.
Counsel for the respondent is directed to supply the copy of reply today
itself. Matter to
come up on 12.02.2021 for arguments. |
K K KHANDELWAL SAMIR KUMAR SUBHASH CHANDER KUSH |
View Order |
22-Dec-2020 |
04-Nov-2020 |
PENDING |
Arguments heard.
The matter is referred for mediation in
pursuance of the orders of the authority with respect to mediation under section 89 of the Code of
Civil Procedure, 1908.
The parties are directed to file
settlement deed on 26.11.2020, if any.
In case settlement is not reached between the parties, the matter shall
be heard on merits on 17.12.2020 |
K K KHANDELWAL SAMIR KUMAR SUBHASH CHANDER KUSH |
View Order |
07-Nov-2020 |
16-Sep-2020 |
PENDING |
DUE TO COVID-19 PANDEMIC, THE MATTER IS ADJOURNED TO 04.11.2020 |
K K KHANDELWAL SAMIR KUMAR SUBHASH CHANDER KUSH |
View Order |
17-Sep-2020 |
29-Jul-2020 |
PENDING |
DUE TO COVID-19 PANDEMIC, THE CASE IS ADJOURNED TO 16.09.2020 |
K K KHANDELWAL SAMIR KUMAR SUBHASH CHANDER KUSH |
View Order |
29-Jul-2020 |
12-May-2020 |
PENDING |
In order to obviate the menace of Coronavirus, Court is adjourned. Matter is fixed for 29.07.2020. |
K K KHANDELWAL SAMIR KUMAR SUBHASH CHANDER KUSH |
View Order |
30-May-2020 |
26-Mar-2020 |
PENDING |
In order to obviate the menace of Coronavirus, Court is adjourned. Matter is fixed for 12.05.2020. |
K K KHANDELWAL SAMIR KUMAR SUBHASH CHANDER KUSH |
View Order |
11-May-2020 |
07-Feb-2020 |
PENDING |
CORAM NOT COMPLETE. ADJOURNED TO 26.3.2020. |
K K KHANDELWAL SAMIR KUMAR SUBHASH CHANDER KUSH |
View Order |
07-Feb-2020 |
10-Dec-2019 |
FIRST HEARING |
THE CASE IS ADJOURNED TO 07.02.2020. BY THE ORDER OF THE AUTHORITY. |
K K KHANDELWAL SAMIR KUMAR SUBHASH CHANDER KUSH |
View Order |
12-Dec-2019 |